Optimal Conditions for Absorbable Fixation of Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Implants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HAP) implants are common in craniofacial surgery; the major problem with HAP implants is fixation instability. An ultrasound-assisted pinned resorbable fixation system has recently been introduced. The authors hypothesized that this resorbable system could be used to fix HAP implants. The authors evaluated the optimal HAP porosity and resorbable pin using the pull-out test and microscopic analysis. Hydroxyapatite blocks were synthesized with 0% (dense type), 35% (fine pore type), and 50% (large pore type) porosity. Bioabsorbable pins of 4 sizes were tested: diameters of 1.6 or 2.1mm and lengths of 4 or 7mm. Among the 1.6mm diameter pins, the 7-mm length pins showed higher pull-out strength (large pore, 6.5±1.2 kgf; fine pore, 4.1±0.7 kgf; dense, 2.4±0.4 kgf) than the 4-mm length pins (large pore, 2.1±1.0 kgf; fine pore, 1.3±0.4 kgf; dense, 1.5±0.9 kgf) with all 3 HAP types (P<0.01). Among 2.1-mm diameter pins, all were removed from the large and fine pore HAP types without any resistance. Only three of seven 2.1×7mm pins inserted into the dense type HAP showed pull-out strength (3.9±2.1 kgf). Among all conditions, the 7-mm length, 1.6-mm diameter pin in large pore type HAP showed the highest pull-out strength. Microscopically, the large pore type HAP showed the liquefying pin flowing into the large pore adjacent to the pilot hole. By contrast, the fine pore and dense pore types of HAP did not allow flow, and the pins did not change in structure 3-dimensionally. The authors found that pull-out strength depends on HAP porosity, and pin length and diameter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-250
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Ceramics
Durapatite
Porosity

Keywords

  • Bioabsorbable fixation
  • cranioplasty
  • hydroxyapatite
  • physical strength
  • porosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Optimal Conditions for Absorbable Fixation of Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Implants. / Sakamoto, Yoshiaki; Kishi, Kazuo.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 248-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b06cdb94c9c4d8c90ad1d4843af8d42,
title = "Optimal Conditions for Absorbable Fixation of Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Implants",
abstract = "Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HAP) implants are common in craniofacial surgery; the major problem with HAP implants is fixation instability. An ultrasound-assisted pinned resorbable fixation system has recently been introduced. The authors hypothesized that this resorbable system could be used to fix HAP implants. The authors evaluated the optimal HAP porosity and resorbable pin using the pull-out test and microscopic analysis. Hydroxyapatite blocks were synthesized with 0{\%} (dense type), 35{\%} (fine pore type), and 50{\%} (large pore type) porosity. Bioabsorbable pins of 4 sizes were tested: diameters of 1.6 or 2.1mm and lengths of 4 or 7mm. Among the 1.6mm diameter pins, the 7-mm length pins showed higher pull-out strength (large pore, 6.5±1.2 kgf; fine pore, 4.1±0.7 kgf; dense, 2.4±0.4 kgf) than the 4-mm length pins (large pore, 2.1±1.0 kgf; fine pore, 1.3±0.4 kgf; dense, 1.5±0.9 kgf) with all 3 HAP types (P<0.01). Among 2.1-mm diameter pins, all were removed from the large and fine pore HAP types without any resistance. Only three of seven 2.1×7mm pins inserted into the dense type HAP showed pull-out strength (3.9±2.1 kgf). Among all conditions, the 7-mm length, 1.6-mm diameter pin in large pore type HAP showed the highest pull-out strength. Microscopically, the large pore type HAP showed the liquefying pin flowing into the large pore adjacent to the pilot hole. By contrast, the fine pore and dense pore types of HAP did not allow flow, and the pins did not change in structure 3-dimensionally. The authors found that pull-out strength depends on HAP porosity, and pin length and diameter.",
keywords = "Bioabsorbable fixation, cranioplasty, hydroxyapatite, physical strength, porosity",
author = "Yoshiaki Sakamoto and Kazuo Kishi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000004151",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "248--250",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal Conditions for Absorbable Fixation of Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Implants

AU - Sakamoto, Yoshiaki

AU - Kishi, Kazuo

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HAP) implants are common in craniofacial surgery; the major problem with HAP implants is fixation instability. An ultrasound-assisted pinned resorbable fixation system has recently been introduced. The authors hypothesized that this resorbable system could be used to fix HAP implants. The authors evaluated the optimal HAP porosity and resorbable pin using the pull-out test and microscopic analysis. Hydroxyapatite blocks were synthesized with 0% (dense type), 35% (fine pore type), and 50% (large pore type) porosity. Bioabsorbable pins of 4 sizes were tested: diameters of 1.6 or 2.1mm and lengths of 4 or 7mm. Among the 1.6mm diameter pins, the 7-mm length pins showed higher pull-out strength (large pore, 6.5±1.2 kgf; fine pore, 4.1±0.7 kgf; dense, 2.4±0.4 kgf) than the 4-mm length pins (large pore, 2.1±1.0 kgf; fine pore, 1.3±0.4 kgf; dense, 1.5±0.9 kgf) with all 3 HAP types (P<0.01). Among 2.1-mm diameter pins, all were removed from the large and fine pore HAP types without any resistance. Only three of seven 2.1×7mm pins inserted into the dense type HAP showed pull-out strength (3.9±2.1 kgf). Among all conditions, the 7-mm length, 1.6-mm diameter pin in large pore type HAP showed the highest pull-out strength. Microscopically, the large pore type HAP showed the liquefying pin flowing into the large pore adjacent to the pilot hole. By contrast, the fine pore and dense pore types of HAP did not allow flow, and the pins did not change in structure 3-dimensionally. The authors found that pull-out strength depends on HAP porosity, and pin length and diameter.

AB - Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HAP) implants are common in craniofacial surgery; the major problem with HAP implants is fixation instability. An ultrasound-assisted pinned resorbable fixation system has recently been introduced. The authors hypothesized that this resorbable system could be used to fix HAP implants. The authors evaluated the optimal HAP porosity and resorbable pin using the pull-out test and microscopic analysis. Hydroxyapatite blocks were synthesized with 0% (dense type), 35% (fine pore type), and 50% (large pore type) porosity. Bioabsorbable pins of 4 sizes were tested: diameters of 1.6 or 2.1mm and lengths of 4 or 7mm. Among the 1.6mm diameter pins, the 7-mm length pins showed higher pull-out strength (large pore, 6.5±1.2 kgf; fine pore, 4.1±0.7 kgf; dense, 2.4±0.4 kgf) than the 4-mm length pins (large pore, 2.1±1.0 kgf; fine pore, 1.3±0.4 kgf; dense, 1.5±0.9 kgf) with all 3 HAP types (P<0.01). Among 2.1-mm diameter pins, all were removed from the large and fine pore HAP types without any resistance. Only three of seven 2.1×7mm pins inserted into the dense type HAP showed pull-out strength (3.9±2.1 kgf). Among all conditions, the 7-mm length, 1.6-mm diameter pin in large pore type HAP showed the highest pull-out strength. Microscopically, the large pore type HAP showed the liquefying pin flowing into the large pore adjacent to the pilot hole. By contrast, the fine pore and dense pore types of HAP did not allow flow, and the pins did not change in structure 3-dimensionally. The authors found that pull-out strength depends on HAP porosity, and pin length and diameter.

KW - Bioabsorbable fixation

KW - cranioplasty

KW - hydroxyapatite

KW - physical strength

KW - porosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039735547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039735547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004151

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004151

M3 - Article

C2 - 29287001

AN - SCOPUS:85039735547

VL - 29

SP - 248

EP - 250

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 1

ER -