TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal trough concentration of teicoplanin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Hanai, Yuki
AU - Takahashi, Yoshiko
AU - Niwa, Takashi
AU - Mayumi, Toshihiko
AU - Hamada, Yukihiro
AU - Kimura, Toshimi
AU - Matsumoto, Kazuaki
AU - Fujii, Satoshi
AU - Takesue, Yoshio
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Takashi Ueda, PhD, from Hyogo College of Medicine for providing additional, individual patient date from his original publication to fit our meta-analysis. We thank Joe Barber Jr., PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Funding Information:
Y. Takesue received grant support from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., 322 Ltd. and Shionogi & Co., Ltd. and payment for lectures from Astellas Pharma Inc. and 323 MSD Japan. Y. Hamada has received speaker honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - What is known and objective: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 μg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 μg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin. Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. Results and discussion: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin < 15 μg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13–1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49–1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18–2.44, p = 0.54). What is new and conclusion: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15–30 μg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin < 15 μg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.
AB - What is known and objective: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 μg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 μg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin. Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. Results and discussion: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin < 15 μg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13–1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin = 15–30 μg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49–1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18–2.44, p = 0.54). What is new and conclusion: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15–30 μg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin < 15 μg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.
KW - gram-positive bacteria
KW - meta-analysis
KW - methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
KW - teicoplanin
KW - therapeutic drug monitoring
KW - trough concentration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100580763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100580763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jcpt.13366
DO - 10.1111/jcpt.13366
M3 - Article
C2 - 33547647
AN - SCOPUS:85100580763
SN - 0269-4727
VL - 46
SP - 622
EP - 632
JO - Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
JF - Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
IS - 3
ER -