Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers

Akiomi Inoue, Norito Kawakami, Masao Ishizaki, Akihito Shimazu, Masao Tsuchiya, Masaji Tabata, Miki Akiyama, Akiko Kitazume, Mitsuyo Kuroda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort-reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support). Methods A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted. Results In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement. Conclusion The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Psychology
Reward
Workplace
Japan

Keywords

  • Effort-reward imbalance model
  • Job demands-control model
  • Organizational justice
  • Psychological distress
  • Work engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers. / Inoue, Akiomi; Kawakami, Norito; Ishizaki, Masao; Shimazu, Akihito; Tsuchiya, Masao; Tabata, Masaji; Akiyama, Miki; Kitazume, Akiko; Kuroda, Mitsuyo.

In: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 83, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 29-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Inoue, Akiomi ; Kawakami, Norito ; Ishizaki, Masao ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Tsuchiya, Masao ; Tabata, Masaji ; Akiyama, Miki ; Kitazume, Akiko ; Kuroda, Mitsuyo. / Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers. In: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2010 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 29-38.
@article{e000adaea4af4c388d6dbb71206810ca,
title = "Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers",
abstract = "Purpose To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort-reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support). Methods A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted. Results In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement. Conclusion The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.",
keywords = "Effort-reward imbalance model, Job demands-control model, Organizational justice, Psychological distress, Work engagement",
author = "Akiomi Inoue and Norito Kawakami and Masao Ishizaki and Akihito Shimazu and Masao Tsuchiya and Masaji Tabata and Miki Akiyama and Akiko Kitazume and Mitsuyo Kuroda",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00420-009-0485-7",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "29--38",
journal = "International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health",
issn = "0340-0131",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers

AU - Inoue, Akiomi

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Ishizaki, Masao

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Tsuchiya, Masao

AU - Tabata, Masaji

AU - Akiyama, Miki

AU - Kitazume, Akiko

AU - Kuroda, Mitsuyo

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort-reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support). Methods A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted. Results In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement. Conclusion The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.

AB - Purpose To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort-reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support). Methods A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted. Results In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement. Conclusion The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.

KW - Effort-reward imbalance model

KW - Job demands-control model

KW - Organizational justice

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Work engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77249099231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77249099231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00420-009-0485-7

DO - 10.1007/s00420-009-0485-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 19904552

AN - SCOPUS:77249099231

VL - 83

SP - 29

EP - 38

JO - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

JF - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

SN - 0340-0131

IS - 1

ER -