Pattern of scholarly publication by chronological analysis

Mariko Shibano, Keiko Kurata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the process of scholars, publication actuvity by fol-lowing their scholary productivity through their life. About 2 winners of the 1981 Nobel Prize for physics and chemistry, their career, publication records, type of publications, language in publications, and coauthorship are examined. Main findings are as follows: (1) In both of physics and chemistry, their publications are mostly collaboration. And a high degree correlation between coauthorship and researh productivity are finded. But type of coauthorship are different in physics and chemistry. (2) Relation between the career and research productivity is finded in only chemistry. (3) In chemistry, journal article and patent are mainly used. And type of publications are different by coauthor group. In physics, most of publications are journal articles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-110
Number of pages18
JournalLibrary and Information Science
Volume1987
Issue number25
Publication statusPublished - 1987

Fingerprint

chemistry
physics
productivity
career
patent
language
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Pattern of scholarly publication by chronological analysis. / Shibano, Mariko; Kurata, Keiko.

In: Library and Information Science, Vol. 1987, No. 25, 1987, p. 93-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af316de998ae4919a1ae74ceb8e810d5,
title = "Pattern of scholarly publication by chronological analysis",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to clarify the process of scholars, publication actuvity by fol-lowing their scholary productivity through their life. About 2 winners of the 1981 Nobel Prize for physics and chemistry, their career, publication records, type of publications, language in publications, and coauthorship are examined. Main findings are as follows: (1) In both of physics and chemistry, their publications are mostly collaboration. And a high degree correlation between coauthorship and researh productivity are finded. But type of coauthorship are different in physics and chemistry. (2) Relation between the career and research productivity is finded in only chemistry. (3) In chemistry, journal article and patent are mainly used. And type of publications are different by coauthor group. In physics, most of publications are journal articles.",
author = "Mariko Shibano and Keiko Kurata",
year = "1987",
language = "English",
volume = "1987",
pages = "93--110",
journal = "Library and Information Science",
issn = "0373-4447",
publisher = "Mita Society for Library and Information Science",
number = "25",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pattern of scholarly publication by chronological analysis

AU - Shibano, Mariko

AU - Kurata, Keiko

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to clarify the process of scholars, publication actuvity by fol-lowing their scholary productivity through their life. About 2 winners of the 1981 Nobel Prize for physics and chemistry, their career, publication records, type of publications, language in publications, and coauthorship are examined. Main findings are as follows: (1) In both of physics and chemistry, their publications are mostly collaboration. And a high degree correlation between coauthorship and researh productivity are finded. But type of coauthorship are different in physics and chemistry. (2) Relation between the career and research productivity is finded in only chemistry. (3) In chemistry, journal article and patent are mainly used. And type of publications are different by coauthor group. In physics, most of publications are journal articles.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to clarify the process of scholars, publication actuvity by fol-lowing their scholary productivity through their life. About 2 winners of the 1981 Nobel Prize for physics and chemistry, their career, publication records, type of publications, language in publications, and coauthorship are examined. Main findings are as follows: (1) In both of physics and chemistry, their publications are mostly collaboration. And a high degree correlation between coauthorship and researh productivity are finded. But type of coauthorship are different in physics and chemistry. (2) Relation between the career and research productivity is finded in only chemistry. (3) In chemistry, journal article and patent are mainly used. And type of publications are different by coauthor group. In physics, most of publications are journal articles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55249101340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55249101340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:55249101340

VL - 1987

SP - 93

EP - 110

JO - Library and Information Science

JF - Library and Information Science

SN - 0373-4447

IS - 25

ER -