Performance analysis of atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing systems and atmospheric optical code division multiplexing systems

Kenji Wakafuji, Tomoaki Ohtsuki

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyze the performance of the atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing (AO-SCM) systems and the atmospheric optical code division multiplexing (AO-CDM) systems. We derive the average received carrier-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (CINR) of the AO-SCM systems and the AO-CDM systems on a turbulence channel with the scintillation and the nonlinearity of an LD. We show that the received CINR of the AO-CDM systems is larger than that of the AO-SCM systems when the number of channels is small for the same optical modulation index (OMI), and vice versa when the number of channels is large for the same OMI. For instance, when the logarithm variance of scintillation σX2 is 0.3, a constant of the nonlinearity of an LD a3 is 0.17, and the number of channels K is 4, the maximum CINR of the AO-CDM systems is about 4 dB better than that of the AO-SCM systems. Also, when K is 16, the maximum CINR of the AO-SCM systems is about 3 dB better than that of the AO-CDM systems. The difference of CINR results in the difference of the maximum achievable number of channels for the systems. When the required BER is 10-9, AO-SCM and AO-CDM systems can accomodate 16 and 8 BPSK channels, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIEEE International Conference on Communications
Pages3336-3340
Number of pages5
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes
Event2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications - Paris, France
Duration: 2004 Jun 202004 Jun 24

Other

Other2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications
CountryFrance
CityParis
Period04/6/2004/6/24

Fingerprint

Multiplexing
Light modulation
Scintillation
Modulation
Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Media Technology

Cite this

Performance analysis of atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing systems and atmospheric optical code division multiplexing systems. / Wakafuji, Kenji; Ohtsuki, Tomoaki.

IEEE International Conference on Communications. Vol. 6 2004. p. 3336-3340.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Wakafuji, K & Ohtsuki, T 2004, Performance analysis of atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing systems and atmospheric optical code division multiplexing systems. in IEEE International Conference on Communications. vol. 6, pp. 3336-3340, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Paris, France, 04/6/20.
@inproceedings{c08919b5c41a4bcba77321e9a557b843,
title = "Performance analysis of atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing systems and atmospheric optical code division multiplexing systems",
abstract = "We analyze the performance of the atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing (AO-SCM) systems and the atmospheric optical code division multiplexing (AO-CDM) systems. We derive the average received carrier-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (CINR) of the AO-SCM systems and the AO-CDM systems on a turbulence channel with the scintillation and the nonlinearity of an LD. We show that the received CINR of the AO-CDM systems is larger than that of the AO-SCM systems when the number of channels is small for the same optical modulation index (OMI), and vice versa when the number of channels is large for the same OMI. For instance, when the logarithm variance of scintillation σX2 is 0.3, a constant of the nonlinearity of an LD a3 is 0.17, and the number of channels K is 4, the maximum CINR of the AO-CDM systems is about 4 dB better than that of the AO-SCM systems. Also, when K is 16, the maximum CINR of the AO-SCM systems is about 3 dB better than that of the AO-CDM systems. The difference of CINR results in the difference of the maximum achievable number of channels for the systems. When the required BER is 10-9, AO-SCM and AO-CDM systems can accomodate 16 and 8 BPSK channels, respectively.",
author = "Kenji Wakafuji and Tomoaki Ohtsuki",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "3336--3340",
booktitle = "IEEE International Conference on Communications",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Performance analysis of atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing systems and atmospheric optical code division multiplexing systems

AU - Wakafuji, Kenji

AU - Ohtsuki, Tomoaki

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - We analyze the performance of the atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing (AO-SCM) systems and the atmospheric optical code division multiplexing (AO-CDM) systems. We derive the average received carrier-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (CINR) of the AO-SCM systems and the AO-CDM systems on a turbulence channel with the scintillation and the nonlinearity of an LD. We show that the received CINR of the AO-CDM systems is larger than that of the AO-SCM systems when the number of channels is small for the same optical modulation index (OMI), and vice versa when the number of channels is large for the same OMI. For instance, when the logarithm variance of scintillation σX2 is 0.3, a constant of the nonlinearity of an LD a3 is 0.17, and the number of channels K is 4, the maximum CINR of the AO-CDM systems is about 4 dB better than that of the AO-SCM systems. Also, when K is 16, the maximum CINR of the AO-SCM systems is about 3 dB better than that of the AO-CDM systems. The difference of CINR results in the difference of the maximum achievable number of channels for the systems. When the required BER is 10-9, AO-SCM and AO-CDM systems can accomodate 16 and 8 BPSK channels, respectively.

AB - We analyze the performance of the atmospheric optical subcarrier multiplexing (AO-SCM) systems and the atmospheric optical code division multiplexing (AO-CDM) systems. We derive the average received carrier-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (CINR) of the AO-SCM systems and the AO-CDM systems on a turbulence channel with the scintillation and the nonlinearity of an LD. We show that the received CINR of the AO-CDM systems is larger than that of the AO-SCM systems when the number of channels is small for the same optical modulation index (OMI), and vice versa when the number of channels is large for the same OMI. For instance, when the logarithm variance of scintillation σX2 is 0.3, a constant of the nonlinearity of an LD a3 is 0.17, and the number of channels K is 4, the maximum CINR of the AO-CDM systems is about 4 dB better than that of the AO-SCM systems. Also, when K is 16, the maximum CINR of the AO-SCM systems is about 3 dB better than that of the AO-CDM systems. The difference of CINR results in the difference of the maximum achievable number of channels for the systems. When the required BER is 10-9, AO-SCM and AO-CDM systems can accomodate 16 and 8 BPSK channels, respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143135558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143135558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:4143135558

VL - 6

SP - 3336

EP - 3340

BT - IEEE International Conference on Communications

ER -