Performance analysis of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We analyze the error probability performance of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel. Moreover we investigate the error performance of convolutional coded MPPM and RS coded MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. We define a distance between symbols as the number of nonoverlapping pulses in one symbol, and by using the distance we analyze the error performance of MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. It is shown that MPPM has better performance than PPM in the error probability performance in noisy photon counting channel. For PPM in noisy photon counting channel, convolutional codes are more effective than RS codes to reduce the average transmitting power. For MPPM in noisy photon counting channel, however, RS codes are shown to be more effective than convolutional codes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1381-1386
Number of pages6
JournalIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
VolumeE77-A
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1994 Aug

Fingerprint

Pulse Position Modulation
Pulse position modulation
Photon Counting
Performance Analysis
Photons
Convolutional codes
Convolutional Codes
Error Probability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{052edd4e3381469fb07838aae9467dad,
title = "Performance analysis of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel",
abstract = "We analyze the error probability performance of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel. Moreover we investigate the error performance of convolutional coded MPPM and RS coded MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. We define a distance between symbols as the number of nonoverlapping pulses in one symbol, and by using the distance we analyze the error performance of MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. It is shown that MPPM has better performance than PPM in the error probability performance in noisy photon counting channel. For PPM in noisy photon counting channel, convolutional codes are more effective than RS codes to reduce the average transmitting power. For MPPM in noisy photon counting channel, however, RS codes are shown to be more effective than convolutional codes.",
author = "Tomoaki Ohtsuki and Iwao Sasase and Shinsaku Mori",
year = "1994",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "E77-A",
pages = "1381--1386",
journal = "IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences",
issn = "0916-8508",
publisher = "Maruzen Co., Ltd/Maruzen Kabushikikaisha",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance analysis of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel

AU - Ohtsuki, Tomoaki

AU - Sasase, Iwao

AU - Mori, Shinsaku

PY - 1994/8

Y1 - 1994/8

N2 - We analyze the error probability performance of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel. Moreover we investigate the error performance of convolutional coded MPPM and RS coded MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. We define a distance between symbols as the number of nonoverlapping pulses in one symbol, and by using the distance we analyze the error performance of MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. It is shown that MPPM has better performance than PPM in the error probability performance in noisy photon counting channel. For PPM in noisy photon counting channel, convolutional codes are more effective than RS codes to reduce the average transmitting power. For MPPM in noisy photon counting channel, however, RS codes are shown to be more effective than convolutional codes.

AB - We analyze the error probability performance of multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) in noisy photon counting channel. Moreover we investigate the error performance of convolutional coded MPPM and RS coded MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. We define a distance between symbols as the number of nonoverlapping pulses in one symbol, and by using the distance we analyze the error performance of MPPM in noisy photon counting channel. It is shown that MPPM has better performance than PPM in the error probability performance in noisy photon counting channel. For PPM in noisy photon counting channel, convolutional codes are more effective than RS codes to reduce the average transmitting power. For MPPM in noisy photon counting channel, however, RS codes are shown to be more effective than convolutional codes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028482249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028482249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028482249

VL - E77-A

SP - 1381

EP - 1386

JO - IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences

JF - IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences

SN - 0916-8508

IS - 8

ER -