Performance of noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output and continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction surgery

Yoshifumi Kotake, Kiyoshi Moriyama, Yasushi Innami, Hideyuki Shimizu, Toshihiko Ueda, Hiroshi Morisaki, Junzo Takeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In the partial CO2 rebreathing method, monitored changes in CO2 elimination and end-tidal CO2 in response to a brief rebreathing period are used to estimate cardiac output. However, dynamic changes in CO2 production during ischemia and reperfusion may affect the accuracy of these estimates. This study was designed to compare measurements of cardiac output as produced by the partial CO2 rebreathing (NICO), bolus (BCO), and continuous thermodilution (CCO) methods of monitoring cardiac output. Methods: Cardiac output was continuously monitored using both NICO and CCO in 28 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. BCO measurements were taken at the following intervals when hemodynamic stability was achieved: (1) after anesthetic induction; (2) during aortic cross-clamp; (3) at reperfusion of the iliac artery; and, (4) during peritoneal closure. Results: The bias and precision (1 SD) derived from all the measurements between NICO and BCO was -0.58 ± 0.9 1/min, whereas for CCO and BCO it was 0.38 ± 1.17 1/min. The bias between NICO and BCO was small after anesthetic induction and during cross-clamp, but increased following reperfusion. The bias between CCO and BCO was relatively small until reperfusion but increased significantly at peritoneal closure. Conclusions: Results indicate that in aortic reconstruction surgery the performance of NICO monitoring is comparable with that of CCO; however, the direction of bias in these continuous measurement devices is the opposite.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-288
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thermodilution
Cardiac Output
Reperfusion
Anesthetics
Iliac Artery
Ischemia
Hemodynamics
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Performance of noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output and continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction surgery. / Kotake, Yoshifumi; Moriyama, Kiyoshi; Innami, Yasushi; Shimizu, Hideyuki; Ueda, Toshihiko; Morisaki, Hiroshi; Takeda, Junzo.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 99, No. 2, 01.08.2003, p. 283-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a447dd2969034af29b9a2f548e4d4dad,
title = "Performance of noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output and continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction surgery",
abstract = "Background: In the partial CO2 rebreathing method, monitored changes in CO2 elimination and end-tidal CO2 in response to a brief rebreathing period are used to estimate cardiac output. However, dynamic changes in CO2 production during ischemia and reperfusion may affect the accuracy of these estimates. This study was designed to compare measurements of cardiac output as produced by the partial CO2 rebreathing (NICO), bolus (BCO), and continuous thermodilution (CCO) methods of monitoring cardiac output. Methods: Cardiac output was continuously monitored using both NICO and CCO in 28 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. BCO measurements were taken at the following intervals when hemodynamic stability was achieved: (1) after anesthetic induction; (2) during aortic cross-clamp; (3) at reperfusion of the iliac artery; and, (4) during peritoneal closure. Results: The bias and precision (1 SD) derived from all the measurements between NICO and BCO was -0.58 ± 0.9 1/min, whereas for CCO and BCO it was 0.38 ± 1.17 1/min. The bias between NICO and BCO was small after anesthetic induction and during cross-clamp, but increased following reperfusion. The bias between CCO and BCO was relatively small until reperfusion but increased significantly at peritoneal closure. Conclusions: Results indicate that in aortic reconstruction surgery the performance of NICO monitoring is comparable with that of CCO; however, the direction of bias in these continuous measurement devices is the opposite.",
author = "Yoshifumi Kotake and Kiyoshi Moriyama and Yasushi Innami and Hideyuki Shimizu and Toshihiko Ueda and Hiroshi Morisaki and Junzo Takeda",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000542-200308000-00009",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "283--288",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing cardiac output and continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction surgery

AU - Kotake, Yoshifumi

AU - Moriyama, Kiyoshi

AU - Innami, Yasushi

AU - Shimizu, Hideyuki

AU - Ueda, Toshihiko

AU - Morisaki, Hiroshi

AU - Takeda, Junzo

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Background: In the partial CO2 rebreathing method, monitored changes in CO2 elimination and end-tidal CO2 in response to a brief rebreathing period are used to estimate cardiac output. However, dynamic changes in CO2 production during ischemia and reperfusion may affect the accuracy of these estimates. This study was designed to compare measurements of cardiac output as produced by the partial CO2 rebreathing (NICO), bolus (BCO), and continuous thermodilution (CCO) methods of monitoring cardiac output. Methods: Cardiac output was continuously monitored using both NICO and CCO in 28 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. BCO measurements were taken at the following intervals when hemodynamic stability was achieved: (1) after anesthetic induction; (2) during aortic cross-clamp; (3) at reperfusion of the iliac artery; and, (4) during peritoneal closure. Results: The bias and precision (1 SD) derived from all the measurements between NICO and BCO was -0.58 ± 0.9 1/min, whereas for CCO and BCO it was 0.38 ± 1.17 1/min. The bias between NICO and BCO was small after anesthetic induction and during cross-clamp, but increased following reperfusion. The bias between CCO and BCO was relatively small until reperfusion but increased significantly at peritoneal closure. Conclusions: Results indicate that in aortic reconstruction surgery the performance of NICO monitoring is comparable with that of CCO; however, the direction of bias in these continuous measurement devices is the opposite.

AB - Background: In the partial CO2 rebreathing method, monitored changes in CO2 elimination and end-tidal CO2 in response to a brief rebreathing period are used to estimate cardiac output. However, dynamic changes in CO2 production during ischemia and reperfusion may affect the accuracy of these estimates. This study was designed to compare measurements of cardiac output as produced by the partial CO2 rebreathing (NICO), bolus (BCO), and continuous thermodilution (CCO) methods of monitoring cardiac output. Methods: Cardiac output was continuously monitored using both NICO and CCO in 28 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. BCO measurements were taken at the following intervals when hemodynamic stability was achieved: (1) after anesthetic induction; (2) during aortic cross-clamp; (3) at reperfusion of the iliac artery; and, (4) during peritoneal closure. Results: The bias and precision (1 SD) derived from all the measurements between NICO and BCO was -0.58 ± 0.9 1/min, whereas for CCO and BCO it was 0.38 ± 1.17 1/min. The bias between NICO and BCO was small after anesthetic induction and during cross-clamp, but increased following reperfusion. The bias between CCO and BCO was relatively small until reperfusion but increased significantly at peritoneal closure. Conclusions: Results indicate that in aortic reconstruction surgery the performance of NICO monitoring is comparable with that of CCO; however, the direction of bias in these continuous measurement devices is the opposite.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042344943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042344943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00009

M3 - Article

C2 - 12883400

AN - SCOPUS:0042344943

VL - 99

SP - 283

EP - 288

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 2

ER -