TY - JOUR
T1 - PET imaging reveals distinctive roles for different regional adipose tissue depots in systemic glucose metabolism in nonobese humans
AU - Ng, Jason M.
AU - Azuma, Koichiro
AU - Kelley, Carol
AU - Pencek, Richard
AU - Radikova, Zofia
AU - Laymon, Charles
AU - Price, Julie
AU - Goodpaster, Bret H.
AU - Kelley, David E.
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - Excess amounts of abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral (VAT) adipose tissue (AT) are associated with insulin resistance, even in normal-weight subjects. In contrast, gluteal-femoral AT (GFAT) is hypothesized to offer protection against insulin resistance. Dynamic PET imaging studies were undertaken to examine the contributions of both metabolic activity and size (volume) of these depots in systemic glucose metabolism. Nonobese, healthy volunteers (n = 15) underwent dynamic PET imaging uptake of [18F]FDG at a steady-state (20 mU·m-2·min-1) insulin infusion. PET images of tissue [18F]FDG activity were coregistered with MRI to derive K values for insulin-stimulated rates of fractional glucose uptake within tissue. Adipose tissue volume was calculated from DEXA and MRI. VAT had significantly higher rates of fractional glucose uptake per volume than SAT (P < 0.05) or GFAT (P < 0.01). KGFAT correlated positively (r = 0.67, P < 0.01) with systemic insulin sensitivity [glucose disappearance rate (Rd)] and negatively with insulin-suppressed FFA (r = -0.71, P < 0.01). SAT (r = -0.70, P < 0.01) and VAT mass (r = -0.55, P < 0.05) correlated negatively with Rd, but GFAT mass did not. We conclude that rates of fractional glucose uptake within GFAT and VAT are significantly and positively associated with systemic insulin sensitivity in nonobese subjects. Furthermore, whereas SAT and VAT amounts are confirmed to relate to systemic insulin resistance, GFAT amount is not associated with insulin resistance. These dynamic PET imaging studies indicate that both quantity and quality of specific AT depots have distinct roles in systemic insulin resistance and may help explain the metabolically obese but normal-weight phenotype.
AB - Excess amounts of abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral (VAT) adipose tissue (AT) are associated with insulin resistance, even in normal-weight subjects. In contrast, gluteal-femoral AT (GFAT) is hypothesized to offer protection against insulin resistance. Dynamic PET imaging studies were undertaken to examine the contributions of both metabolic activity and size (volume) of these depots in systemic glucose metabolism. Nonobese, healthy volunteers (n = 15) underwent dynamic PET imaging uptake of [18F]FDG at a steady-state (20 mU·m-2·min-1) insulin infusion. PET images of tissue [18F]FDG activity were coregistered with MRI to derive K values for insulin-stimulated rates of fractional glucose uptake within tissue. Adipose tissue volume was calculated from DEXA and MRI. VAT had significantly higher rates of fractional glucose uptake per volume than SAT (P < 0.05) or GFAT (P < 0.01). KGFAT correlated positively (r = 0.67, P < 0.01) with systemic insulin sensitivity [glucose disappearance rate (Rd)] and negatively with insulin-suppressed FFA (r = -0.71, P < 0.01). SAT (r = -0.70, P < 0.01) and VAT mass (r = -0.55, P < 0.05) correlated negatively with Rd, but GFAT mass did not. We conclude that rates of fractional glucose uptake within GFAT and VAT are significantly and positively associated with systemic insulin sensitivity in nonobese subjects. Furthermore, whereas SAT and VAT amounts are confirmed to relate to systemic insulin resistance, GFAT amount is not associated with insulin resistance. These dynamic PET imaging studies indicate that both quantity and quality of specific AT depots have distinct roles in systemic insulin resistance and may help explain the metabolically obese but normal-weight phenotype.
KW - Insulin sensitivity
KW - Positron emission tomography imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868333588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868333588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/ajpendo.00282.2012
DO - 10.1152/ajpendo.00282.2012
M3 - Article
C2 - 22967498
AN - SCOPUS:84868333588
SN - 0193-1849
VL - 303
SP - E1134-E1141
JO - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 9
ER -