Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads

Samuel D. Epstein, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Daniel Seely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As Chomsky (2004, 2005) notes, a theory with set-Merge allows this operation to apply in two different ways, externally (to two separate objects) and internally (one object contained within the other). Here we extend Chomsky's form of argument to pair-Merge; i.e. in the absence of some stipulation preventing it, it too can apply in two ways: internally and externally. We will argue that external pair-Merge of heads overcomes a paradox concerning bridge verb constructions. In the final section we note that external pair-Merge of heads is, in effect, a "presyntactic" morphological ("word formation") rule entailed by current syntactic theory. The extent to which the standard theory of morphological operations can be subsumed by external pair-Merge of heads, further unifying syntax and (aspects of) morphology is left for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-102
Number of pages16
JournalLinguistic Review
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Feb 1

Fingerprint

syntax
Noam Chomsky
Syntax
Syntactic Theory
Formation Rules
Verbs
Stipulations
Paradox
Word Formation

Keywords

  • copies
  • merge
  • minimalism
  • pair-merge
  • phase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads. / Epstein, Samuel D.; Kitahara, Hisatsugu; Seely, Daniel.

In: Linguistic Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 87-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Samuel D. ; Kitahara, Hisatsugu ; Seely, Daniel. / Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads. In: Linguistic Review. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 87-102.
@article{356e6b4a35204462b746d5a691c8e521,
title = "Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads",
abstract = "As Chomsky (2004, 2005) notes, a theory with set-Merge allows this operation to apply in two different ways, externally (to two separate objects) and internally (one object contained within the other). Here we extend Chomsky's form of argument to pair-Merge; i.e. in the absence of some stipulation preventing it, it too can apply in two ways: internally and externally. We will argue that external pair-Merge of heads overcomes a paradox concerning bridge verb constructions. In the final section we note that external pair-Merge of heads is, in effect, a {"}presyntactic{"} morphological ({"}word formation{"}) rule entailed by current syntactic theory. The extent to which the standard theory of morphological operations can be subsumed by external pair-Merge of heads, further unifying syntax and (aspects of) morphology is left for further research.",
keywords = "copies, merge, minimalism, pair-merge, phase",
author = "Epstein, {Samuel D.} and Hisatsugu Kitahara and Daniel Seely",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/tlr-2015-0015",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "87--102",
journal = "Linguistic Review",
issn = "0167-6318",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads

AU - Epstein, Samuel D.

AU - Kitahara, Hisatsugu

AU - Seely, Daniel

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - As Chomsky (2004, 2005) notes, a theory with set-Merge allows this operation to apply in two different ways, externally (to two separate objects) and internally (one object contained within the other). Here we extend Chomsky's form of argument to pair-Merge; i.e. in the absence of some stipulation preventing it, it too can apply in two ways: internally and externally. We will argue that external pair-Merge of heads overcomes a paradox concerning bridge verb constructions. In the final section we note that external pair-Merge of heads is, in effect, a "presyntactic" morphological ("word formation") rule entailed by current syntactic theory. The extent to which the standard theory of morphological operations can be subsumed by external pair-Merge of heads, further unifying syntax and (aspects of) morphology is left for further research.

AB - As Chomsky (2004, 2005) notes, a theory with set-Merge allows this operation to apply in two different ways, externally (to two separate objects) and internally (one object contained within the other). Here we extend Chomsky's form of argument to pair-Merge; i.e. in the absence of some stipulation preventing it, it too can apply in two ways: internally and externally. We will argue that external pair-Merge of heads overcomes a paradox concerning bridge verb constructions. In the final section we note that external pair-Merge of heads is, in effect, a "presyntactic" morphological ("word formation") rule entailed by current syntactic theory. The extent to which the standard theory of morphological operations can be subsumed by external pair-Merge of heads, further unifying syntax and (aspects of) morphology is left for further research.

KW - copies

KW - merge

KW - minimalism

KW - pair-merge

KW - phase

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958776887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958776887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/tlr-2015-0015

DO - 10.1515/tlr-2015-0015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958776887

VL - 33

SP - 87

EP - 102

JO - Linguistic Review

JF - Linguistic Review

SN - 0167-6318

IS - 1

ER -