Position constrained bilateral control by oblique coordinate control considering priority of tasks

Sho Sakaino, Tomoya Sato, Kouhei Ohnishi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes two position constrained bilateral controllers. The constraint is given by coordinate transformation and additional compensator or command modification methods are not necessary. The constraint therefore does not destabilize the system and maintains linearity. The difference between the two proposed methods is the task priority. The first ensures slave position limitation and force regulation between two robots, the other ensures position limitation and position regulation between the robots. We analyzed the stability of the proposed controller. The validity of the proposed methods was confirmed experimentally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-305
Number of pages8
JournalIEEJ Journal of Industry Applications
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Robots
Controllers

Keywords

  • Bilateral control
  • Constrained system
  • Haptics
  • Oblique coordinate control
  • Position constraint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Position constrained bilateral control by oblique coordinate control considering priority of tasks. / Sakaino, Sho; Sato, Tomoya; Ohnishi, Kouhei.

In: IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications, Vol. 2, No. 6, 2013, p. 298-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sakaino, Sho ; Sato, Tomoya ; Ohnishi, Kouhei. / Position constrained bilateral control by oblique coordinate control considering priority of tasks. In: IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications. 2013 ; Vol. 2, No. 6. pp. 298-305.
@article{ede62aa0976c428da9e742670c4876ae,
title = "Position constrained bilateral control by oblique coordinate control considering priority of tasks",
abstract = "This paper proposes two position constrained bilateral controllers. The constraint is given by coordinate transformation and additional compensator or command modification methods are not necessary. The constraint therefore does not destabilize the system and maintains linearity. The difference between the two proposed methods is the task priority. The first ensures slave position limitation and force regulation between two robots, the other ensures position limitation and position regulation between the robots. We analyzed the stability of the proposed controller. The validity of the proposed methods was confirmed experimentally.",
keywords = "Bilateral control, Constrained system, Haptics, Oblique coordinate control, Position constraint",
author = "Sho Sakaino and Tomoya Sato and Kouhei Ohnishi",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1541/ieejjia.2.298",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "298--305",
journal = "IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications",
issn = "2187-1094",
publisher = "The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Position constrained bilateral control by oblique coordinate control considering priority of tasks

AU - Sakaino, Sho

AU - Sato, Tomoya

AU - Ohnishi, Kouhei

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper proposes two position constrained bilateral controllers. The constraint is given by coordinate transformation and additional compensator or command modification methods are not necessary. The constraint therefore does not destabilize the system and maintains linearity. The difference between the two proposed methods is the task priority. The first ensures slave position limitation and force regulation between two robots, the other ensures position limitation and position regulation between the robots. We analyzed the stability of the proposed controller. The validity of the proposed methods was confirmed experimentally.

AB - This paper proposes two position constrained bilateral controllers. The constraint is given by coordinate transformation and additional compensator or command modification methods are not necessary. The constraint therefore does not destabilize the system and maintains linearity. The difference between the two proposed methods is the task priority. The first ensures slave position limitation and force regulation between two robots, the other ensures position limitation and position regulation between the robots. We analyzed the stability of the proposed controller. The validity of the proposed methods was confirmed experimentally.

KW - Bilateral control

KW - Constrained system

KW - Haptics

KW - Oblique coordinate control

KW - Position constraint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010055501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010055501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1541/ieejjia.2.298

DO - 10.1541/ieejjia.2.298

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 298

EP - 305

JO - IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications

JF - IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications

SN - 2187-1094

IS - 6

ER -