TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential palliative care quality indicators in heart disease patients
T2 - A review of the literature
AU - Mizuno, Atsushi
AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori
AU - Hayashi, Akitoshi
AU - Kawai, Fujimi
AU - Niwa, Koichiro
AU - Utsunomiya, Akemi
AU - Kohsaka, Shun
AU - Kohno, Takashi
AU - Yamamoto, Takeshi
AU - Takayama, Morimasa
AU - Anzai, Toshihisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - In spite of the increasing interest in palliative care for heart disease, data on the detailed methods of palliative care and its efficacy specifically in heart disease are still lacking. A structured PubMed literature review revealed no quality indicators of palliative care in heart disease. Therefore, we performed a narrative overview of the potential quality indicators in heart disease by reviewing previous literature concerning quality indicators in cancer patients. We summarize seven potential categories of quality indicators in heart disease: (1) presence and availability of a palliative care unit, palliative care team, and outpatient palliative care; (2) human resources such as number of skilled staff; (3) infrastructure; (4) presence and frequency of documentation or family survey; (5) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data and disease-specific patient quality of life such as The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); (6) questionnaires and interviews about the quality of palliative care after death, including bereaved family surveys; and (7) admission-related outcomes such as place of death and intensive care unit length of stay. Although detailed measurements of palliative care quality have not been validated in heart disease, many indicators developed in cancer patients might also be applicable to heart disease. This new categorization might be useful to determine quality indicators in heart disease patients.
AB - In spite of the increasing interest in palliative care for heart disease, data on the detailed methods of palliative care and its efficacy specifically in heart disease are still lacking. A structured PubMed literature review revealed no quality indicators of palliative care in heart disease. Therefore, we performed a narrative overview of the potential quality indicators in heart disease by reviewing previous literature concerning quality indicators in cancer patients. We summarize seven potential categories of quality indicators in heart disease: (1) presence and availability of a palliative care unit, palliative care team, and outpatient palliative care; (2) human resources such as number of skilled staff; (3) infrastructure; (4) presence and frequency of documentation or family survey; (5) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data and disease-specific patient quality of life such as The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); (6) questionnaires and interviews about the quality of palliative care after death, including bereaved family surveys; and (7) admission-related outcomes such as place of death and intensive care unit length of stay. Although detailed measurements of palliative care quality have not been validated in heart disease, many indicators developed in cancer patients might also be applicable to heart disease. This new categorization might be useful to determine quality indicators in heart disease patients.
KW - End-of-life
KW - Heart disease
KW - Heart failure
KW - Palliative care
KW - Quality indicator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017423617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017423617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.02.010
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28427868
AN - SCOPUS:85017423617
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 70
SP - 335
EP - 341
JO - Journal of Cardiography
JF - Journal of Cardiography
IS - 4
ER -