TY - JOUR
T1 - Practical guidance for treatment of patients with diabetes using flash glucose monitoring
T2 - a pilot study
AU - Koide, Keiko
AU - Azuma, Koichiro
AU - Nojima, Jun
AU - Kodama, Kenichiro
AU - Atsumi, Yoshihito
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/8/7
Y1 - 2018/8/7
N2 - Background: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is a factory-calibrated, blood glucose measuring sensor system for patients with diabetes. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the sensor glucose (SG) value obtained using an FGM device and the traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) value. Methods: In 30 patients with diabetes under insulin treatment, SG and SMBG values were measured for 2 weeks, and the correlation between the values was analyzed. Results: The mean number of accumulated measurements of SG values was 1223.2 ± 193.0, whereas that of the SMBG values was 49.2 ± 21.3. Although SG and SMBG values showed a favorable correlation (R 2 = 0.8413), SG values were lower than SMBG values by an average of 7.9 ± 29.8 mg/dL. The correlation patterns fell into four types: low type (SG values lower than SMBG values; n = 12), high type (SG values higher than SMBG values; n = 3), cross type (the slope of the two regression lines crossed at a certain measurement value; n = 14), and matching type (the values overlapped; n = 1). Conclusions: Recognition of the characteristic correlation patterns between SG and SMBG values is indispensable for certified diabetes educators to provide appropriate treatment guidance to patients with diabetes.
AB - Background: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is a factory-calibrated, blood glucose measuring sensor system for patients with diabetes. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the sensor glucose (SG) value obtained using an FGM device and the traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) value. Methods: In 30 patients with diabetes under insulin treatment, SG and SMBG values were measured for 2 weeks, and the correlation between the values was analyzed. Results: The mean number of accumulated measurements of SG values was 1223.2 ± 193.0, whereas that of the SMBG values was 49.2 ± 21.3. Although SG and SMBG values showed a favorable correlation (R 2 = 0.8413), SG values were lower than SMBG values by an average of 7.9 ± 29.8 mg/dL. The correlation patterns fell into four types: low type (SG values lower than SMBG values; n = 12), high type (SG values higher than SMBG values; n = 3), cross type (the slope of the two regression lines crossed at a certain measurement value; n = 14), and matching type (the values overlapped; n = 1). Conclusions: Recognition of the characteristic correlation patterns between SG and SMBG values is indispensable for certified diabetes educators to provide appropriate treatment guidance to patients with diabetes.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Certified diabetes educator
KW - Flash glucose monitoring (FGM)
KW - Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051207123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051207123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13098-018-0364-z
DO - 10.1186/s13098-018-0364-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051207123
SN - 1758-5996
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
JF - Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
IS - 1
ER -