Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies

Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands

Sabien Dobbelaere, Kozo Kiyota, Jacques Mairesse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Allowing for three labor market settings (perfect competition or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining and monopsony), this paper relies on two extensions of Hall's econometric framework for estimating simultaneously price-cost margins and scale economies. Using an unbalanced panel of 17653 firms over the period 1986-2001 in France, 8728 firms over the period 1994-2006 in Japan and 7828 firms over the period 1993-2008 in the Netherlands, we first apply two procedures to classify 30 comparable manufacturing industries in 6 distinct regimes that differ in terms of the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. For each of the predominant regimes in each country, we then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfections and scale economies. Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the three countries, we find important regime differences across the three countries and also observe differences in the levels of product market imperfections and scale economies within regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-322
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Comparative Economics
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 1

Fingerprint

Scale economies
France
Labor market imperfections
The Netherlands
Japan
Product market
Labour market
Industrial relations
Market imperfections
Unbalanced panels
Monopsony
Price-cost margin
Econometrics
Perfect competition
Industry
Manufacturing industries

Keywords

  • Monopsony
  • Panel data
  • Price-cost mark-ups
  • Production function
  • Rent sharing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies : Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands. / Dobbelaere, Sabien; Kiyota, Kozo; Mairesse, Jacques.

In: Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 290-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21dc56cf109944ae81c30716ee842ea5,
title = "Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies: Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands",
abstract = "Allowing for three labor market settings (perfect competition or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining and monopsony), this paper relies on two extensions of Hall's econometric framework for estimating simultaneously price-cost margins and scale economies. Using an unbalanced panel of 17653 firms over the period 1986-2001 in France, 8728 firms over the period 1994-2006 in Japan and 7828 firms over the period 1993-2008 in the Netherlands, we first apply two procedures to classify 30 comparable manufacturing industries in 6 distinct regimes that differ in terms of the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. For each of the predominant regimes in each country, we then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfections and scale economies. Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the three countries, we find important regime differences across the three countries and also observe differences in the levels of product market imperfections and scale economies within regimes.",
keywords = "Monopsony, Panel data, Price-cost mark-ups, Production function, Rent sharing",
author = "Sabien Dobbelaere and Kozo Kiyota and Jacques Mairesse",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jce.2014.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "290--322",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Economics",
issn = "0147-5967",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies

T2 - Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands

AU - Dobbelaere, Sabien

AU - Kiyota, Kozo

AU - Mairesse, Jacques

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Allowing for three labor market settings (perfect competition or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining and monopsony), this paper relies on two extensions of Hall's econometric framework for estimating simultaneously price-cost margins and scale economies. Using an unbalanced panel of 17653 firms over the period 1986-2001 in France, 8728 firms over the period 1994-2006 in Japan and 7828 firms over the period 1993-2008 in the Netherlands, we first apply two procedures to classify 30 comparable manufacturing industries in 6 distinct regimes that differ in terms of the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. For each of the predominant regimes in each country, we then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfections and scale economies. Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the three countries, we find important regime differences across the three countries and also observe differences in the levels of product market imperfections and scale economies within regimes.

AB - Allowing for three labor market settings (perfect competition or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining and monopsony), this paper relies on two extensions of Hall's econometric framework for estimating simultaneously price-cost margins and scale economies. Using an unbalanced panel of 17653 firms over the period 1986-2001 in France, 8728 firms over the period 1994-2006 in Japan and 7828 firms over the period 1993-2008 in the Netherlands, we first apply two procedures to classify 30 comparable manufacturing industries in 6 distinct regimes that differ in terms of the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. For each of the predominant regimes in each country, we then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfections and scale economies. Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the three countries, we find important regime differences across the three countries and also observe differences in the levels of product market imperfections and scale economies within regimes.

KW - Monopsony

KW - Panel data

KW - Price-cost mark-ups

KW - Production function

KW - Rent sharing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928419921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928419921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jce.2014.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jce.2014.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 290

EP - 322

JO - Journal of Comparative Economics

JF - Journal of Comparative Economics

SN - 0147-5967

IS - 2

ER -