TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
T2 - Exploratory analysis of JCOG9907
AU - Kataoka, Kozo
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
AU - Mizusawa, Junki
AU - Igaki, Hiroyasu
AU - Ozawa, Soji
AU - Abe, Tetsuya
AU - Nakamura, Kenichi
AU - Kato, Ken
AU - Ando, Nobutoshi
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure: This study was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-16, 23-A-19, 26-A-4), and Grants-in- Aid for Cancer Research (17S-3, 20S-3) from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate the influence of infectious complications on the outcome of current standard preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery for clinical stage II/III esophageal cancer. Background: The impact of postoperative infectious complications on survival after transthoracic esophagectomy remains controversial. Methods: Data from a randomized controlled trial (JCOG9907) were used. Infectious complications were classified into three groups: pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and others. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed. Results: Among the 152 analyzed patients, the incidence of pneumonia, leakage, and overall infectious complication were 22 (14%), 21 (14%), and 54 (36%). Overall survival (OS) of patients with any infectious complication was shorter than that of patients without infectious complication [hazard ratio, HR 1.66, 95% confidence interval, CI, (1.02-2.71)] and progression-free survival (PFS) also tended to be shorter in patients with any infectious complication [HR 1.44, (0.92-2.24)]. The OS of patients with pneumonia was shorter than that of patients without pneumonia [HR 1.82, (1.01-3.29)], and PFS also tended to be shorter in patients with pneumonia [HR 1.50, (0.85-2.62)]. The OS of patients with anastomotic leakage (n = 21) was nearly identical to that for patients without leakage [HR 1.06, (0.52-2.13)] and PFS showed the same tendency [HR 1.28, (0.71-2.32)]. Multivariate analysis revealed that pneumonia tended to compromise OS and PFS [HR 1.66, (0.87-3.17) and HR 1.37, (0.75-2.51)]. Conclusions: These results indicate that postoperative infectious complications may worsen patient prognosis after esophagectomy. Performing esophagectomy without postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, may be beneficial for improving survival outcomes.
AB - Objective: To investigate the influence of infectious complications on the outcome of current standard preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery for clinical stage II/III esophageal cancer. Background: The impact of postoperative infectious complications on survival after transthoracic esophagectomy remains controversial. Methods: Data from a randomized controlled trial (JCOG9907) were used. Infectious complications were classified into three groups: pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and others. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed. Results: Among the 152 analyzed patients, the incidence of pneumonia, leakage, and overall infectious complication were 22 (14%), 21 (14%), and 54 (36%). Overall survival (OS) of patients with any infectious complication was shorter than that of patients without infectious complication [hazard ratio, HR 1.66, 95% confidence interval, CI, (1.02-2.71)] and progression-free survival (PFS) also tended to be shorter in patients with any infectious complication [HR 1.44, (0.92-2.24)]. The OS of patients with pneumonia was shorter than that of patients without pneumonia [HR 1.82, (1.01-3.29)], and PFS also tended to be shorter in patients with pneumonia [HR 1.50, (0.85-2.62)]. The OS of patients with anastomotic leakage (n = 21) was nearly identical to that for patients without leakage [HR 1.06, (0.52-2.13)] and PFS showed the same tendency [HR 1.28, (0.71-2.32)]. Multivariate analysis revealed that pneumonia tended to compromise OS and PFS [HR 1.66, (0.87-3.17) and HR 1.37, (0.75-2.51)]. Conclusions: These results indicate that postoperative infectious complications may worsen patient prognosis after esophagectomy. Performing esophagectomy without postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, may be beneficial for improving survival outcomes.
KW - Esophagectomy
KW - JCOG9907
KW - Postoperative complication
KW - Preoperative chemotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973570996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973570996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001828
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001828
M3 - Article
C2 - 27280509
AN - SCOPUS:84973570996
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 265
SP - 1152
EP - 1157
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -