TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic utility of molecular factors by age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer
AU - McCleary, Nadine J.
AU - Sato, Kaori
AU - Nishihara, Reiko
AU - Inamura, Kentaro
AU - Morikawa, Teppei
AU - Zhang, Xuehong
AU - Wu, Kana
AU - Yamauchi, Mai
AU - Kim, Sun A.
AU - Sukawa, Yasutaka
AU - Mima, Kosuke
AU - Rong Qian, Zhi
AU - Fuchs, Charles S.
AU - Ogino, Shuji
AU - Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grant Support This project was supported in part by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Young Investigator Award and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Gloria Spivak Faculty Advancement Fund (to N.J. McCleary), the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Cancer Center SPORE (NCI grant P50 CA127003 to C.S. Fuchs), NCI grants R01 CA151993 (to S. Ogino), R35 CA197735 (to S. Ogino), K07 CA190673 (to R. Nishihara), UM1 CA186107 (to M.J. Stampfer), P01 CA87969 (to S.E. Hankinson), R01 CA49449 (to S.E. Hankinson), P01 CA55075 (to W.C. Willett), andUM1CA167552 (to W.C. Willett), and supports from the Paula and Russell Agrusa Fund for Colorectal Cancer Research (to C.S. Fuchs) and the Friends of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (to S. Ogino).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2016/3/15
Y1 - 2016/3/15
N2 - Purpose:Wehypothesized that adverse prognostic associations of specific tumor molecular factors vary by patient age at colorectal cancer diagnosis. ExperimentalDesign:Weexamined the prognostic associations and interactions by age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (<60 vs. 60-74 vs. ≥75 years old) of key molecular factors-CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and nuclear CTNNB1 expression status-on colorectal cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), using 1, 280 incident colorectal cancer cases (median age, 69 years; range, 38-91 years) within the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohorts. Results: MSI-high was associated with better survival, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with worse survival, but these associations did not appreciably differ by age group. Status of CIMP, KRAS mutation, or PIK3CA mutation was not associated with prognosis regardless of age. Nuclear CTNNB1 expression was associated with a trend toward worse prognosis among older adults [age ≥ 75 years; multivariate HR, 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-3.13 (for CSS); multivariate HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.93-2.24 (for OS)] but not among younger patients, and there was a statistically significant interaction by age (Pinteraction = 0.03 for CSS; Pinteraction = 0.007 for OS). Conclusions: Tumor nuclear CTNNB1 expression may be associated with higher mortality among older patients with colorectal cancer but not among younger patients. Our findings need to be confirmed in independent datasets. Detailed exploration of tumor molecular signatures in older patients with colorectal cancer in large populations is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1489-98.
AB - Purpose:Wehypothesized that adverse prognostic associations of specific tumor molecular factors vary by patient age at colorectal cancer diagnosis. ExperimentalDesign:Weexamined the prognostic associations and interactions by age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (<60 vs. 60-74 vs. ≥75 years old) of key molecular factors-CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and nuclear CTNNB1 expression status-on colorectal cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), using 1, 280 incident colorectal cancer cases (median age, 69 years; range, 38-91 years) within the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohorts. Results: MSI-high was associated with better survival, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with worse survival, but these associations did not appreciably differ by age group. Status of CIMP, KRAS mutation, or PIK3CA mutation was not associated with prognosis regardless of age. Nuclear CTNNB1 expression was associated with a trend toward worse prognosis among older adults [age ≥ 75 years; multivariate HR, 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-3.13 (for CSS); multivariate HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.93-2.24 (for OS)] but not among younger patients, and there was a statistically significant interaction by age (Pinteraction = 0.03 for CSS; Pinteraction = 0.007 for OS). Conclusions: Tumor nuclear CTNNB1 expression may be associated with higher mortality among older patients with colorectal cancer but not among younger patients. Our findings need to be confirmed in independent datasets. Detailed exploration of tumor molecular signatures in older patients with colorectal cancer in large populations is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1489-98.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962273945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962273945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0946
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0946
M3 - Article
C2 - 26490308
AN - SCOPUS:84962273945
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 22
SP - 1489
EP - 1498
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 6
ER -