Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan

Mitsuyuki Abe, Yasushi Nagata, Masahiro Hiraoka, Toshihiko Inoue, Minako Sumi, Hiroshi Ikeda, Naoyuki Shigematsu, Takuji Dokiya, Masato Hareyama, Takashi Yamashita, Yutaka Hirokawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of Quality Assurance (QA) has well been recongnized in radiotherapy. However, no standard report on manpower and equipment has been available in Japan. This study is the consensus recommendation of the research group organized under the support of the grant from the Ministry of Health & Wealfare. In this recommendation, radiotherapy institutions were categolized in three groups. The large institution has 300 or more radiotherapy patients per year, medium one 150–300, and small one 150 or less, respectively. The institutions were also categorized according to the following criteria: (1) number of the board certified radiotherapists, (2) number of medical physicists, (3) number of radiotherapy technologists, (4) area of radiotherapy facility, (5) radiotherapy related equipment, (6) experience in intraoperative radiotherapy, stereotactic irradiation, total body irradiation, brachytherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and hyperthermia, (7) patient registration for the JASTRO data base, (8) annual dose calibration by the Radiotherapy Dosimetry Center.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-257
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of JASTRO
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Japan
Radiotherapy
Conformal Radiotherapy
Equipment and Supplies
Organized Financing
Whole-Body Irradiation
Brachytherapy
Calibration
Fever
Databases
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Quality Assurance
  • Radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy Institute
  • Standard

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Abe, M., Nagata, Y., Hiraoka, M., Inoue, T., Sumi, M., Ikeda, H., ... Hirokawa, Y. (1998). Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan. Journal of JASTRO, 10(3), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.11182/jastro1989.10.249

Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan. / Abe, Mitsuyuki; Nagata, Yasushi; Hiraoka, Masahiro; Inoue, Toshihiko; Sumi, Minako; Ikeda, Hiroshi; Shigematsu, Naoyuki; Dokiya, Takuji; Hareyama, Masato; Yamashita, Takashi; Hirokawa, Yutaka.

In: Journal of JASTRO, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1998, p. 249-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abe, M, Nagata, Y, Hiraoka, M, Inoue, T, Sumi, M, Ikeda, H, Shigematsu, N, Dokiya, T, Hareyama, M, Yamashita, T & Hirokawa, Y 1998, 'Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan', Journal of JASTRO, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 249-257. https://doi.org/10.11182/jastro1989.10.249
Abe M, Nagata Y, Hiraoka M, Inoue T, Sumi M, Ikeda H et al. Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan. Journal of JASTRO. 1998;10(3):249-257. https://doi.org/10.11182/jastro1989.10.249
Abe, Mitsuyuki ; Nagata, Yasushi ; Hiraoka, Masahiro ; Inoue, Toshihiko ; Sumi, Minako ; Ikeda, Hiroshi ; Shigematsu, Naoyuki ; Dokiya, Takuji ; Hareyama, Masato ; Yamashita, Takashi ; Hirokawa, Yutaka. / Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan. In: Journal of JASTRO. 1998 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 249-257.
@article{3bcf4a1238b74460ad732562c324c840,
title = "Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan",
abstract = "The importance of Quality Assurance (QA) has well been recongnized in radiotherapy. However, no standard report on manpower and equipment has been available in Japan. This study is the consensus recommendation of the research group organized under the support of the grant from the Ministry of Health & Wealfare. In this recommendation, radiotherapy institutions were categolized in three groups. The large institution has 300 or more radiotherapy patients per year, medium one 150–300, and small one 150 or less, respectively. The institutions were also categorized according to the following criteria: (1) number of the board certified radiotherapists, (2) number of medical physicists, (3) number of radiotherapy technologists, (4) area of radiotherapy facility, (5) radiotherapy related equipment, (6) experience in intraoperative radiotherapy, stereotactic irradiation, total body irradiation, brachytherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and hyperthermia, (7) patient registration for the JASTRO data base, (8) annual dose calibration by the Radiotherapy Dosimetry Center.",
keywords = "Quality Assurance, Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Institute, Standard",
author = "Mitsuyuki Abe and Yasushi Nagata and Masahiro Hiraoka and Toshihiko Inoue and Minako Sumi and Hiroshi Ikeda and Naoyuki Shigematsu and Takuji Dokiya and Masato Hareyama and Takashi Yamashita and Yutaka Hirokawa",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.11182/jastro1989.10.249",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "249--257",
journal = "Journal of JASTRO",
issn = "1040-9564",
publisher = "Editorial Board of JASTRO",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proposed standardization for radiotherapy institutions in Japan

AU - Abe, Mitsuyuki

AU - Nagata, Yasushi

AU - Hiraoka, Masahiro

AU - Inoue, Toshihiko

AU - Sumi, Minako

AU - Ikeda, Hiroshi

AU - Shigematsu, Naoyuki

AU - Dokiya, Takuji

AU - Hareyama, Masato

AU - Yamashita, Takashi

AU - Hirokawa, Yutaka

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The importance of Quality Assurance (QA) has well been recongnized in radiotherapy. However, no standard report on manpower and equipment has been available in Japan. This study is the consensus recommendation of the research group organized under the support of the grant from the Ministry of Health & Wealfare. In this recommendation, radiotherapy institutions were categolized in three groups. The large institution has 300 or more radiotherapy patients per year, medium one 150–300, and small one 150 or less, respectively. The institutions were also categorized according to the following criteria: (1) number of the board certified radiotherapists, (2) number of medical physicists, (3) number of radiotherapy technologists, (4) area of radiotherapy facility, (5) radiotherapy related equipment, (6) experience in intraoperative radiotherapy, stereotactic irradiation, total body irradiation, brachytherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and hyperthermia, (7) patient registration for the JASTRO data base, (8) annual dose calibration by the Radiotherapy Dosimetry Center.

AB - The importance of Quality Assurance (QA) has well been recongnized in radiotherapy. However, no standard report on manpower and equipment has been available in Japan. This study is the consensus recommendation of the research group organized under the support of the grant from the Ministry of Health & Wealfare. In this recommendation, radiotherapy institutions were categolized in three groups. The large institution has 300 or more radiotherapy patients per year, medium one 150–300, and small one 150 or less, respectively. The institutions were also categorized according to the following criteria: (1) number of the board certified radiotherapists, (2) number of medical physicists, (3) number of radiotherapy technologists, (4) area of radiotherapy facility, (5) radiotherapy related equipment, (6) experience in intraoperative radiotherapy, stereotactic irradiation, total body irradiation, brachytherapy, conformal radiotherapy, and hyperthermia, (7) patient registration for the JASTRO data base, (8) annual dose calibration by the Radiotherapy Dosimetry Center.

KW - Quality Assurance

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Radiotherapy Institute

KW - Standard

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004890118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004890118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11182/jastro1989.10.249

DO - 10.11182/jastro1989.10.249

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0004890118

VL - 10

SP - 249

EP - 257

JO - Journal of JASTRO

JF - Journal of JASTRO

SN - 1040-9564

IS - 3

ER -