Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein A as a marker of respiratory distress in forensic pathology: Assessment of the immunohistochemical and biochemical findings

Hitoshi Maeda, Masaki Q. Fujita, Bao Li Zhu, Kaori Ishida, Li Quan, Shigeki Oritani, Mari Taniguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to review the immunohistochemical and biochemical findings with reference to the causes of death in routine casework (total, n = 492). In the immunohistochemistry (n = 283), an increase in intra-alveolar granular SP-A (SP-A score) was often observed in asphyxiation (n = 21/34, 61.8%) and freshwater drowning (n = 15/24, 62.5%), and also in fire and methamphetamine (MA) fatalities (n = 22/76, 28.9% and n = 5/16, 31.3%). Serum SP-A level (n = 134) was elevated in acute respiratory distress syndrome and in some cases of drowning, fire and MA fatalities, hyperthermia and chest traumas. A quantitative analysis of SP-A subclass-gene expression (SP-A1/A2 mRNA) in the lung tissue specimens (n = 126) revealed an increase in the SP-A1/A2 mRNA ratio in asphyxiation (n = 17/21, 80.9%), freshwater drowning (n = 7/9, 77.7%), fire and MA fatalities (n = 20/35, 57.1% and n = 8/10, 80.0%). These findings suggested the usefulness of SP-A as a marker of asphyxiation, respiratory distress and alveolar injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S318-S321
JournalLegal Medicine
Volume5
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Asphyxiation
  • Blood biochemistry
  • Forensic pathology
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein A
  • RNA assay
  • Respiratory distress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein A as a marker of respiratory distress in forensic pathology: Assessment of the immunohistochemical and biochemical findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this