Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy

K. Yoshioka, A. B. Connolly, O. A. Ogunbiyi, H. Hasegawa, D. G. Morton, M. R B Keighley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation. Methods: A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0-24 using an endoscopic score. Results: Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9%) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18%, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1 g/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45 g/cm after Picolax (p < 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 ± 2.2) than picolax (3.1 ± 2.9; p < 0.05). Conclusions:These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-70
Number of pages5
JournalDigestive Surgery
Volume17
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Colonoscopy
sodium phosphate
picosulfate sodium
Nausea
Abdominal Pain
Fear
Vomiting
Fatigue

Keywords

  • Bowel preparation
  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Faecal residue
  • Picolax, safety and efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Yoshioka, K., Connolly, A. B., Ogunbiyi, O. A., Hasegawa, H., Morton, D. G., & Keighley, M. R. B. (2000). Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Digestive Surgery, 17(1), 66-70.

Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. / Yoshioka, K.; Connolly, A. B.; Ogunbiyi, O. A.; Hasegawa, H.; Morton, D. G.; Keighley, M. R B.

In: Digestive Surgery, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2000, p. 66-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoshioka, K, Connolly, AB, Ogunbiyi, OA, Hasegawa, H, Morton, DG & Keighley, MRB 2000, 'Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy', Digestive Surgery, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 66-70.
Yoshioka, K. ; Connolly, A. B. ; Ogunbiyi, O. A. ; Hasegawa, H. ; Morton, D. G. ; Keighley, M. R B. / Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. In: Digestive Surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 66-70.
@article{c78fef710d034c14bbe6f80bbdba44b5,
title = "Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy",
abstract = "Background: Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation. Methods: A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0-24 using an endoscopic score. Results: Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9{\%}) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18{\%}, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1 g/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45 g/cm after Picolax (p < 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 ± 2.2) than picolax (3.1 ± 2.9; p < 0.05). Conclusions:These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
keywords = "Bowel preparation, Colonoscopy, Colorectal surgery, Faecal residue, Picolax, safety and efficacy",
author = "K. Yoshioka and Connolly, {A. B.} and Ogunbiyi, {O. A.} and H. Hasegawa and Morton, {D. G.} and Keighley, {M. R B}",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "66--70",
journal = "Digestive Surgery",
issn = "0253-4886",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy

AU - Yoshioka, K.

AU - Connolly, A. B.

AU - Ogunbiyi, O. A.

AU - Hasegawa, H.

AU - Morton, D. G.

AU - Keighley, M. R B

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation. Methods: A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0-24 using an endoscopic score. Results: Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9%) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18%, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1 g/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45 g/cm after Picolax (p < 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 ± 2.2) than picolax (3.1 ± 2.9; p < 0.05). Conclusions:These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

AB - Background: Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation. Methods: A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0-24 using an endoscopic score. Results: Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9%) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18%, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1 g/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45 g/cm after Picolax (p < 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 ± 2.2) than picolax (3.1 ± 2.9; p < 0.05). Conclusions:These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

KW - Bowel preparation

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal surgery

KW - Faecal residue

KW - Picolax, safety and efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034052367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034052367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 66

EP - 70

JO - Digestive Surgery

JF - Digestive Surgery

SN - 0253-4886

IS - 1

ER -