Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: The PROTECT study

Atsushi Tanaka, Toyoaki Murohara, Isao Taguchi, Kazuo Eguchi, Makoto Suzuki, Masafumi Kitakaze, Yasunori Sato, Tomoko Ishizu, Yukihito Higashi, Hirotsugu Yamada, Mamoru Nanasato, Michio Shimabukuro, Hiroki Teragawa, Shinichiro Ueda, Satoshi Kodera, Munehide Matsuhisa, Toshiaki Kadokami, Kazuomi Kario, Yoshihiko Nishio, Teruo InoueKoji Maemura, Jun ichi Oyama, Mitsuru Ohishi, Masataka Sata, Hirofumi Tomiyama, Koichi Node

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated strongly with an increased risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, leading to impaired quality of life and shortened life expectancy. In addition to appropriate glycemic control, multi-factorial intervention for a wide range of risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is crucial for management of diabetes. A recent cardiovascular outcome trial in diabetes patients with higher cardiovascular risk demonstrated that a SGLT2 inhibitor markedly reduced mortality, but not macro-vascular events. However, to date there is no clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on arteriosclerosis. The ongoing PROTECT trial was designed to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitors, ipragliflozin, prevented progression of carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: A total of 480 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a HbA1c between 6 and 10 % despite receiving diet/exercise therapy and/or standard anti-diabetic agents for at least 3 months, will be randomized systematically (1:1) into either ipragliflozin or control (continuation of conventional therapy) groups. After randomization, ipragliflozin (50-100 mg once daily) will be added on to the background therapy in participants assigned to the ipragliflozin group. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from baseline to 24 months. Images of carotid intima-media thickness will be analyzed at a central core laboratory in a blinded manner. The key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline in other parameters of carotid intima-media thickness, various metabolic parameters, and renal function. Other cardiovascular functional tests are also planned for several sub-studies. Discussion: The PROTECT study is the first to assess the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis using carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker. The study has potential to clarify the protective effects of ipragliflozin on atherosclerosis. Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN000018440 ( https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021348 )

Original languageEnglish
Article number133
JournalCardiovascular Diabetology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 13

Keywords

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Intima-media thickness (IMT)
  • Ipragliflozin
  • SGLT2 inhibitor
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: The PROTECT study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Tanaka, A., Murohara, T., Taguchi, I., Eguchi, K., Suzuki, M., Kitakaze, M., Sato, Y., Ishizu, T., Higashi, Y., Yamada, H., Nanasato, M., Shimabukuro, M., Teragawa, H., Ueda, S., Kodera, S., Matsuhisa, M., Kadokami, T., Kario, K., Nishio, Y., ... Node, K. (2016). Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: The PROTECT study. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 15(1), [133]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7