TY - JOUR
T1 - Reclassification of 400 consecutive glioma cases based on the revised 2016WHO classification
AU - Akagi, Yojiro
AU - Yoshimoto, Koji
AU - Hata, Nobuhiro
AU - Kuga, Daisuke
AU - Hatae, Ryusuke
AU - Amemiya, Takeo
AU - Sangatsuda, Yuhei
AU - Suzuki, Satoshi O.
AU - Iwaki, Toru
AU - Mizoguchi, Masahiro
AU - Iihara, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Ms. Fumie Doi for her technical assistance regarding genetic analysis. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 17K10868, 16K10779 and 17K16652.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - In this study, we reclassified 400 consecutive glioma cases including pediatric cases, using the revised 2016 WHO classification with samples collected from the Kyushu University Brain Tumor Bank. The IDH1/2, H3F3A, key genetic markers in the 2016 classification, were analyzed using high-resolution melting, with DNA extracted from frozen tissues. The 1p/19q codeletions were evaluated using a microsatellite-based loss of heterozygosity analysis, with 18 markers, to detect loss of the entire chromosome arm. In the integrated diagnosis, 29 oligodendroglioma cases and 28 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as “IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted,” while 2 oligodendroglioma cases and 5 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as not otherwise specified (NOS). These “NOS” cases were either IDH-mutants or 1p/19q-codeleted, although characteristic oligodendroglial features were evident histologically. Better overall survival of patients with oligodendroglioma correlated with the molecular characteristic of “IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted,” rather than the WHO grade. Eleven “glioblastoma, IDH-wild-type” cases were classified as “1p/19q-codeleted”, however, chromosome 10 loss was also detected in 10 out of 11 cases. The 2016 WHO criteria for glioma classification leads to better diagnosis of patients. However, there are technical pitfalls and problems to be solved in the molecular analysis of routine diagnostics.
AB - In this study, we reclassified 400 consecutive glioma cases including pediatric cases, using the revised 2016 WHO classification with samples collected from the Kyushu University Brain Tumor Bank. The IDH1/2, H3F3A, key genetic markers in the 2016 classification, were analyzed using high-resolution melting, with DNA extracted from frozen tissues. The 1p/19q codeletions were evaluated using a microsatellite-based loss of heterozygosity analysis, with 18 markers, to detect loss of the entire chromosome arm. In the integrated diagnosis, 29 oligodendroglioma cases and 28 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as “IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted,” while 2 oligodendroglioma cases and 5 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as not otherwise specified (NOS). These “NOS” cases were either IDH-mutants or 1p/19q-codeleted, although characteristic oligodendroglial features were evident histologically. Better overall survival of patients with oligodendroglioma correlated with the molecular characteristic of “IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted,” rather than the WHO grade. Eleven “glioblastoma, IDH-wild-type” cases were classified as “1p/19q-codeleted”, however, chromosome 10 loss was also detected in 10 out of 11 cases. The 2016 WHO criteria for glioma classification leads to better diagnosis of patients. However, there are technical pitfalls and problems to be solved in the molecular analysis of routine diagnostics.
KW - Classification
KW - Glioma
KW - IDH
KW - Molecular diagnosis
KW - TERT
KW - WHO
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044340085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044340085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10014-018-0313-4
DO - 10.1007/s10014-018-0313-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 29569163
AN - SCOPUS:85044340085
SN - 1433-7398
VL - 35
SP - 81
EP - 89
JO - Brain Tumor Pathology
JF - Brain Tumor Pathology
IS - 2
ER -