TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for motion correction of infant fNIRS data applicable to multiple data sets and acquisition systems
AU - Di Lorenzo, Renata
AU - Pirazzoli, Laura
AU - Blasi, Anna
AU - Bulgarelli, Chiara
AU - Hakuno, Yoko
AU - Minagawa, Yasuyo
AU - Brigadoi, Sabrina
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the infants and their families for their participation. The authors would like to thank Prof. Livio Finos for the fruitful discussion and advices on statistical analyses. Dataset 1 was supported by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (2015-115). Data was collected by Chiara Bulgarelli and Dr. Carina De Klerk. The authors would like to thank Professor Victoria Southgate and Professor Antonia Hamilton as PIs of the project for sharing the data. Dataset 2 was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (G0701484), the Simons Foundation (no. SFARI201287), the BASIS Funding Consortium Led by Autistica (www.basisnetwork.org) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 115300, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) and EFPIA companies. The BASIS team in alphabetical order: Baron-Cohen, S. Bedford, R. Bolton, P. Blasi, A. Charman, T. Cheung, H.M. Davies, K. Elsabbagh, M. Fernandes, J. Gammer, I. Gliga, T. Green, J. Guiraud, J. Johnson, M.H. Liew, M. Lloyd-Fox, S. Maris, H. O'Hara, L. Pasco, G. Pickles, A. Ribeiro, H. Salomone, E. Tucker, L. Yemane, F. Dataset 3 was supported by a grant from the European Community's Horizon 2020 Program under grant agreement n° 642996 (Brainview) (RDL). The authors would like to thank Rianne van Rooijen for helping with the fNIRS data acquisition, Carlijn van den Boomen for lab support and Professor Chantal Kemner as PI of the project for providing lab space and equipment. Dataset 4 was supported by a grant from a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (15H01691) (YM) and MEXT Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities. The authors would like to thank Aika Yasui for the fNIRS data collection. S.B. was supported by grant “Progetti di Ateneo Bando 2015” C92I1600012005 and by “Progetto STARS Grants 2017” C96C18001930005 both from the University of Padova.
Funding Information:
Dataset 3 was supported by a grant from the European Community's Horizon 2020 Program under grant agreement n° 642996 (Brainview) (RDL). The authors would like to thank Rianne van Rooijen for helping with the fNIRS data acquisition, Carlijn van den Boomen for lab support and Professor Chantal Kemner as PI of the project for providing lab space and equipment.
Funding Information:
Dataset 2 was supported by the UK Medical Research Council ( G0701484 ), the Simons Foundation (no. SFARI201287 ), the BASIS Funding Consortium Led by Autistica (www.basisnetwork.org) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 115300, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme ( FP7/2007–2013 ) and EFPIA companies. The BASIS team in alphabetical order: Baron-Cohen, S., Bedford, R. Bolton, P., Blasi, A., Charman, T., Cheung, H.M., Davies, K., Elsabbagh, M., Fernandes, J., Gammer, I., Gliga, T., Green, J., Guiraud, J., Johnson, M.H., Liew, M., Lloyd-Fox, S., Maris, H., O'Hara, L., Pasco, G., Pickles, A., Ribeiro, H., Salomone, E., Tucker, L., Yemane, F.
Funding Information:
Dataset 4 was supported by a grant from a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) ( 15H01691 ) (YM) and MEXT Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities. The authors would like to thank Aika Yasui for the fNIRS data collection.
Funding Information:
Dataset 1 was supported by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant ( 2015-115 ). Data was collected by Chiara Bulgarelli and Dr. Carina De Klerk. The authors would like to thank Professor Victoria Southgate and Professor Antonia Hamilton as PIs of the project for sharing the data.
Funding Information:
S.B. was supported by grant “Progetti di Ateneo Bando 2015” C92I1600012005 and by "Progetto STARS Grants 2017" C96C18001930005 both from the University of Padova.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/10/15
Y1 - 2019/10/15
N2 - Despite motion artifacts are a major source of noise in fNIRS infant data, how to approach motion correction in this population has only recently started to be investigated. Homer2 offers a wide range of motion correction methods and previous work on simulated and adult data suggested the use of Spline interpolation and Wavelet filtering as optimal methods for the recovery of trials affected by motion. However, motion artifacts in infant data differ from those in adults’ both in amplitude and frequency of occurrence. Therefore, artifact correction recommendations derived from adult data might not be optimal for infant data. We hypothesized that the combined use of Spline and Wavelet would outperform their individual use on data with complex profiles of motion artifacts. To demonstrate this, we first compared, on infant semi-simulated data, the performance of several motion correction techniques on their own and of the novel combined approach; then, we investigated the performance of Spline and Wavelet alone and in combination on real cognitive data from three datasets collected with infants of different ages (5, 7 and 10 months), with different tasks (auditory, visual and tactile) and with different NIRS systems. To quantitatively estimate and compare the efficacy of these techniques, we adopted four metrics: hemodynamic response recovery error, within-subject standard deviation, between-subjects standard deviation and number of trials that survived each correction method. Our results demonstrated that (i) it is always better correcting for motion artifacts than rejecting the corrupted trials; (ii) Wavelet filtering on its own and in combination with Spline interpolation seems to be the most effective approach in reducing the between- and the within-subject standard deviations. Importantly, the combination of Spline and Wavelet was the approach providing the best performance in semi-simulation both at low and high levels of noise, also recovering most of the trials affected by motion artifacts across all datasets, a crucial result when working with infant data.
AB - Despite motion artifacts are a major source of noise in fNIRS infant data, how to approach motion correction in this population has only recently started to be investigated. Homer2 offers a wide range of motion correction methods and previous work on simulated and adult data suggested the use of Spline interpolation and Wavelet filtering as optimal methods for the recovery of trials affected by motion. However, motion artifacts in infant data differ from those in adults’ both in amplitude and frequency of occurrence. Therefore, artifact correction recommendations derived from adult data might not be optimal for infant data. We hypothesized that the combined use of Spline and Wavelet would outperform their individual use on data with complex profiles of motion artifacts. To demonstrate this, we first compared, on infant semi-simulated data, the performance of several motion correction techniques on their own and of the novel combined approach; then, we investigated the performance of Spline and Wavelet alone and in combination on real cognitive data from three datasets collected with infants of different ages (5, 7 and 10 months), with different tasks (auditory, visual and tactile) and with different NIRS systems. To quantitatively estimate and compare the efficacy of these techniques, we adopted four metrics: hemodynamic response recovery error, within-subject standard deviation, between-subjects standard deviation and number of trials that survived each correction method. Our results demonstrated that (i) it is always better correcting for motion artifacts than rejecting the corrupted trials; (ii) Wavelet filtering on its own and in combination with Spline interpolation seems to be the most effective approach in reducing the between- and the within-subject standard deviations. Importantly, the combination of Spline and Wavelet was the approach providing the best performance in semi-simulation both at low and high levels of noise, also recovering most of the trials affected by motion artifacts across all datasets, a crucial result when working with infant data.
KW - Infants
KW - Motion correction
KW - Semi-simulated data
KW - fNIRS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068616263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068616263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.056
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.056
M3 - Article
C2 - 31247300
AN - SCOPUS:85068616263
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 200
SP - 511
EP - 527
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
ER -