[Reconstituting evaluation methods based on both qualitative and quantitative paradigms].

Hiroaki Miyata, Suguru Okubo, Satoru Yoshie, Ichiro Kai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Debate about the relationship between quantitative and qualitative paradigms is often muddled and confusing and the clutter of terms and arguments has resulted in the concepts becoming obscure and unrecognizable. In this study we conducted content analysis regarding evaluation methods of qualitative healthcare research. We extracted descriptions on four types of evaluation paradigm (validity/credibility, reliability/credibility, objectivity/confirmability, and generalizability/transferability), and classified them into subcategories. In quantitative research, there has been many evaluation methods based on qualitative paradigms, and vice versa. Thus, it might not be useful to consider evaluation methods of qualitative paradigm are isolated from those of quantitative methods. Choosing practical evaluation methods based on the situation and prior conditions of each study is an important approach for researchers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-94
Number of pages12
JournalNihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene
Volume66
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '[Reconstituting evaluation methods based on both qualitative and quantitative paradigms].'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this