Recovering the emergent logic in a software design exercise

Nozomi Ikeya, Rachael Luck, Dave Randall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops a deeper understanding of professional software design by examining the emergent logic of a software design exercise. Decision-making is evident as a 'product' of activity, including coordinated attention to primarily two artefacts, the brief and the whiteboard. Thus, we pay attention to the 'situatedness' of decision-making, which is not one person's accomplishment, but is interactively carried out through treating what is known to the participants such as requirements written in the brief as 'documentary' of what is to be understood. The paper examines how each pair resolved the requirements uncertainties, by treating different 'users' differently. Our examination reveals how different approaches to the design exercise were actually organised to shed new light on software design practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-629
Number of pages19
JournalDesign Studies
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Nov

Fingerprint

Software design
Decision making
decision making
artifact
uncertainty
examination
human being
software
Software
Logic
Exercise
Decision Making

Keywords

  • design practice
  • ethnomethodology
  • problem solving
  • reasoning
  • software design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Architecture
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Recovering the emergent logic in a software design exercise. / Ikeya, Nozomi; Luck, Rachael; Randall, Dave.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 611-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ikeya, Nozomi ; Luck, Rachael ; Randall, Dave. / Recovering the emergent logic in a software design exercise. In: Design Studies. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 611-629.
@article{2e8c6f6efed24742931d9b0157c48ab8,
title = "Recovering the emergent logic in a software design exercise",
abstract = "This paper develops a deeper understanding of professional software design by examining the emergent logic of a software design exercise. Decision-making is evident as a 'product' of activity, including coordinated attention to primarily two artefacts, the brief and the whiteboard. Thus, we pay attention to the 'situatedness' of decision-making, which is not one person's accomplishment, but is interactively carried out through treating what is known to the participants such as requirements written in the brief as 'documentary' of what is to be understood. The paper examines how each pair resolved the requirements uncertainties, by treating different 'users' differently. Our examination reveals how different approaches to the design exercise were actually organised to shed new light on software design practices.",
keywords = "design practice, ethnomethodology, problem solving, reasoning, software design",
author = "Nozomi Ikeya and Rachael Luck and Dave Randall",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "611--629",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recovering the emergent logic in a software design exercise

AU - Ikeya, Nozomi

AU - Luck, Rachael

AU - Randall, Dave

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - This paper develops a deeper understanding of professional software design by examining the emergent logic of a software design exercise. Decision-making is evident as a 'product' of activity, including coordinated attention to primarily two artefacts, the brief and the whiteboard. Thus, we pay attention to the 'situatedness' of decision-making, which is not one person's accomplishment, but is interactively carried out through treating what is known to the participants such as requirements written in the brief as 'documentary' of what is to be understood. The paper examines how each pair resolved the requirements uncertainties, by treating different 'users' differently. Our examination reveals how different approaches to the design exercise were actually organised to shed new light on software design practices.

AB - This paper develops a deeper understanding of professional software design by examining the emergent logic of a software design exercise. Decision-making is evident as a 'product' of activity, including coordinated attention to primarily two artefacts, the brief and the whiteboard. Thus, we pay attention to the 'situatedness' of decision-making, which is not one person's accomplishment, but is interactively carried out through treating what is known to the participants such as requirements written in the brief as 'documentary' of what is to be understood. The paper examines how each pair resolved the requirements uncertainties, by treating different 'users' differently. Our examination reveals how different approaches to the design exercise were actually organised to shed new light on software design practices.

KW - design practice

KW - ethnomethodology

KW - problem solving

KW - reasoning

KW - software design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870405730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870405730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870405730

VL - 33

SP - 611

EP - 629

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - 6

ER -