Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase

Masahiro Tsujikawa, Yohei Otaka, Rei Hasegawa, Kunitsugu Kondo, Kaori Muraoka, Meigen Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-504
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stroke Volume
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Convalescent Hospital
Echocardiography

Keywords

  • Cardiac function test
  • Comorbidity
  • Convalescent hospital
  • Heart disease
  • Risk factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase. / Tsujikawa, Masahiro; Otaka, Yohei; Hasegawa, Rei; Kondo, Kunitsugu; Muraoka, Kaori; Liu, Meigen.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.01.2018, p. 499-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsujikawa, Masahiro ; Otaka, Yohei ; Hasegawa, Rei ; Kondo, Kunitsugu ; Muraoka, Kaori ; Liu, Meigen. / Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 499-504.
@article{e993d805396b405481bf4ac27182abcf,
title = "Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.",
keywords = "Cardiac function test, Comorbidity, Convalescent hospital, Heart disease, Risk factor",
author = "Masahiro Tsujikawa and Yohei Otaka and Rei Hasegawa and Kunitsugu Kondo and Kaori Muraoka and Meigen Liu",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-2347",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "499--504",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase

AU - Tsujikawa, Masahiro

AU - Otaka, Yohei

AU - Hasegawa, Rei

AU - Kondo, Kunitsugu

AU - Muraoka, Kaori

AU - Liu, Meigen

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.

AB - Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.

KW - Cardiac function test

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Convalescent hospital

KW - Heart disease

KW - Risk factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049402313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049402313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2347

DO - 10.2340/16501977-2347

M3 - Article

C2 - 29736549

AN - SCOPUS:85049402313

VL - 50

SP - 499

EP - 504

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 6

ER -