TY - JOUR
T1 - Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute rehabilitation phase
AU - Tsujikawa, Masahiro
AU - Otaka, Yohei
AU - Hasegawa, Rei
AU - Kondo, Kunitsugu
AU - Muraoka, Kaori
AU - Liu, Meigen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.
AB - Objective: To examine the left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with subacute stroke and compare rehabilitation outcomes between those with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and those without. Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects: A total of 482 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Patients were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography within 7 days of admission. The patients were divided into a group with low left ventricular ejection fraction and a group with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at admission and discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition were compared between groups. Results: The low left ventricular ejection fraction group had significantly lower cognitive and total FIM scores on admission than the preserved left ventricular ejection fraction group. The patients in the low left ventricular ejection fraction group tended to be transferred to acute hospitals more frequently. However, the total score of discharge FIM, FIM gain, and FIM efficiency did not differ significantly between the groups when rehabilitation was continued until discharge. Conclusion: Stroke patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction in the subacute phase could achieve almost the same functional outcomes as those of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although the general medical condition should be considered, the finding of low left ventricular ejection fraction did not pose a barrier to successful rehabilitation after stroke.
KW - Cardiac function test
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Convalescent hospital
KW - Heart disease
KW - Risk factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049402313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049402313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2347
DO - 10.2340/16501977-2347
M3 - Article
C2 - 29736549
AN - SCOPUS:85049402313
SN - 1650-1977
VL - 50
SP - 499
EP - 504
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 6
ER -