Relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses relations between frames and constructions, based on the constructicon-building project within the Japanese FrameNet (JFN) project. The aims are: to clarify distinctions between a framenet lexicon and a constructicon; and to contribute to the on-going discussion on whether all constructions are "meaning-bearing." I will argue that a framenet analysis involves annotating frame-based syntactic/semantic structures of words (simple words and multiwords), while a constructicon annotation pertains to describing the internal and external syntax/semantics of linguistic objects that have complex structures. While maintaining that all constructions are meaning-bearing, I will point out that meaning structures of some constructions may not involve frames and propose a frame-based classification of constructions. Finally, I will suggest that a constructicon annotation needs both semantic frames and interactional frames.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConstructicography
Subtitle of host publicationConstructicon Development across Languages
EditorsBenjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara, Tiago Timponi Torrent
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages141-164
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9789027201003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Publication series

NameConstructional Approaches to Language
Volume22
ISSN (Print)1573-594X

Fingerprint

semantics
syntax
linguistics
Syntax
Annotation
Semantic Structure
Frame Semantics
Lexicon
Interaction

Keywords

  • Annotation
  • Constructicon
  • Construction grammar
  • Frame semantics
  • FrameNet
  • Interactional frame
  • Japanese
  • Semantic frame
  • Syntax-lexicon continuum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Ohara, K. (2018). Relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages (pp. 141-164). (Constructional Approaches to Language; Vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.05oha

Relations between frames and constructions : A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. / Ohara, Kyoko.

Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. ed. / Benjamin Lyngfelt; Lars Borin; Kyoko Ohara; Tiago Timponi Torrent. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018. p. 141-164 (Constructional Approaches to Language; Vol. 22).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ohara, K 2018, Relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. in B Lyngfelt, L Borin, K Ohara & TT Torrent (eds), Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. Constructional Approaches to Language, vol. 22, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.05oha
Ohara K. Relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. In Lyngfelt B, Borin L, Ohara K, Torrent TT, editors, Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2018. p. 141-164. (Constructional Approaches to Language). https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.05oha
Ohara, Kyoko. / Relations between frames and constructions : A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon. Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. editor / Benjamin Lyngfelt ; Lars Borin ; Kyoko Ohara ; Tiago Timponi Torrent. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018. pp. 141-164 (Constructional Approaches to Language).
@inbook{f276f676a88842c89c0ce33351961497,
title = "Relations between frames and constructions: A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon",
abstract = "This chapter discusses relations between frames and constructions, based on the constructicon-building project within the Japanese FrameNet (JFN) project. The aims are: to clarify distinctions between a framenet lexicon and a constructicon; and to contribute to the on-going discussion on whether all constructions are {"}meaning-bearing.{"} I will argue that a framenet analysis involves annotating frame-based syntactic/semantic structures of words (simple words and multiwords), while a constructicon annotation pertains to describing the internal and external syntax/semantics of linguistic objects that have complex structures. While maintaining that all constructions are meaning-bearing, I will point out that meaning structures of some constructions may not involve frames and propose a frame-based classification of constructions. Finally, I will suggest that a constructicon annotation needs both semantic frames and interactional frames.",
keywords = "Annotation, Constructicon, Construction grammar, Frame semantics, FrameNet, Interactional frame, Japanese, Semantic frame, Syntax-lexicon continuum",
author = "Kyoko Ohara",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/cal.22.05oha",
language = "English",
series = "Constructional Approaches to Language",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
pages = "141--164",
editor = "Benjamin Lyngfelt and Lars Borin and Kyoko Ohara and Torrent, {Tiago Timponi}",
booktitle = "Constructicography",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Relations between frames and constructions

T2 - A proposal from the Japanese FrameNet constructicon

AU - Ohara, Kyoko

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This chapter discusses relations between frames and constructions, based on the constructicon-building project within the Japanese FrameNet (JFN) project. The aims are: to clarify distinctions between a framenet lexicon and a constructicon; and to contribute to the on-going discussion on whether all constructions are "meaning-bearing." I will argue that a framenet analysis involves annotating frame-based syntactic/semantic structures of words (simple words and multiwords), while a constructicon annotation pertains to describing the internal and external syntax/semantics of linguistic objects that have complex structures. While maintaining that all constructions are meaning-bearing, I will point out that meaning structures of some constructions may not involve frames and propose a frame-based classification of constructions. Finally, I will suggest that a constructicon annotation needs both semantic frames and interactional frames.

AB - This chapter discusses relations between frames and constructions, based on the constructicon-building project within the Japanese FrameNet (JFN) project. The aims are: to clarify distinctions between a framenet lexicon and a constructicon; and to contribute to the on-going discussion on whether all constructions are "meaning-bearing." I will argue that a framenet analysis involves annotating frame-based syntactic/semantic structures of words (simple words and multiwords), while a constructicon annotation pertains to describing the internal and external syntax/semantics of linguistic objects that have complex structures. While maintaining that all constructions are meaning-bearing, I will point out that meaning structures of some constructions may not involve frames and propose a frame-based classification of constructions. Finally, I will suggest that a constructicon annotation needs both semantic frames and interactional frames.

KW - Annotation

KW - Constructicon

KW - Construction grammar

KW - Frame semantics

KW - FrameNet

KW - Interactional frame

KW - Japanese

KW - Semantic frame

KW - Syntax-lexicon continuum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050534974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050534974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/cal.22.05oha

DO - 10.1075/cal.22.05oha

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85050534974

T3 - Constructional Approaches to Language

SP - 141

EP - 164

BT - Constructicography

A2 - Lyngfelt, Benjamin

A2 - Borin, Lars

A2 - Ohara, Kyoko

A2 - Torrent, Tiago Timponi

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

ER -