Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale: A scale to measure competencies in cognitive therapy

Daisuke Fujisawa, Atsuo Nakagawa, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Mitsuhiro Sado, Miyuki Tajima, Motomi Hanaoka, Jesse H. Wright, Yutaka Ono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to test reliability and validity of the Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale, a self-rating scale that measures basic knowledge of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) concepts and methodology. Furthermore, we explored optimal cutoff score to demonstrate required standard of CBT competency. Methods: The reliability and validity of the scale was tested among 252 mental health professionals. The participants' number of readings relevant to CBT, as well as their experience in training and practice in CBT were used as external standards of competency. Results: The scale has good internal consistency (the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 = 0.76). The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with experience in training and practice in cognitive behavioral therapy, and the number of relevant readings (Spearman's rho = 0.27, 0.28 and 0.44, respectively, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the total score of the scale and experience in general psychosocial care (Spearman's rho = -0.02, P = 0.76). The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis produced the area under curve (AUC) of 0.77 (SD = 0.05, P < 0.001), and a cutoff score of 31/32 produced sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64 to discriminate trainees who have experience of 40 h or more of CBT training and five or more of relevant readings, from those who do not meet this standard. Conclusion: The Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale was successfully validated. It has been demonstrated that the scale specifically assess knowledge in cognitive behavioral therapy. This scale would serve as a rough guide to assess competencies among beginner cognitive behavior therapists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Reproducibility of Results
Reading
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Mental Health
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • competency
  • education in psychiatry
  • psychotherapy
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale : A scale to measure competencies in cognitive therapy. / Fujisawa, Daisuke; Nakagawa, Atsuo; Kikuchi, Toshiaki; Sado, Mitsuhiro; Tajima, Miyuki; Hanaoka, Motomi; Wright, Jesse H.; Ono, Yutaka.

In: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Vol. 65, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 64-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65fbe8e549d64316a1299939b589325b,
title = "Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale: A scale to measure competencies in cognitive therapy",
abstract = "Aim: This study aimed to test reliability and validity of the Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale, a self-rating scale that measures basic knowledge of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) concepts and methodology. Furthermore, we explored optimal cutoff score to demonstrate required standard of CBT competency. Methods: The reliability and validity of the scale was tested among 252 mental health professionals. The participants' number of readings relevant to CBT, as well as their experience in training and practice in CBT were used as external standards of competency. Results: The scale has good internal consistency (the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 = 0.76). The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with experience in training and practice in cognitive behavioral therapy, and the number of relevant readings (Spearman's rho = 0.27, 0.28 and 0.44, respectively, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the total score of the scale and experience in general psychosocial care (Spearman's rho = -0.02, P = 0.76). The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis produced the area under curve (AUC) of 0.77 (SD = 0.05, P < 0.001), and a cutoff score of 31/32 produced sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64 to discriminate trainees who have experience of 40 h or more of CBT training and five or more of relevant readings, from those who do not meet this standard. Conclusion: The Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale was successfully validated. It has been demonstrated that the scale specifically assess knowledge in cognitive behavioral therapy. This scale would serve as a rough guide to assess competencies among beginner cognitive behavior therapists.",
keywords = "cognitive behavioral therapy, competency, education in psychiatry, psychotherapy, training",
author = "Daisuke Fujisawa and Atsuo Nakagawa and Toshiaki Kikuchi and Mitsuhiro Sado and Miyuki Tajima and Motomi Hanaoka and Wright, {Jesse H.} and Yutaka Ono",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02163.x",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "64--69",
journal = "Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences",
issn = "1323-1316",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale

T2 - A scale to measure competencies in cognitive therapy

AU - Fujisawa, Daisuke

AU - Nakagawa, Atsuo

AU - Kikuchi, Toshiaki

AU - Sado, Mitsuhiro

AU - Tajima, Miyuki

AU - Hanaoka, Motomi

AU - Wright, Jesse H.

AU - Ono, Yutaka

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Aim: This study aimed to test reliability and validity of the Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale, a self-rating scale that measures basic knowledge of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) concepts and methodology. Furthermore, we explored optimal cutoff score to demonstrate required standard of CBT competency. Methods: The reliability and validity of the scale was tested among 252 mental health professionals. The participants' number of readings relevant to CBT, as well as their experience in training and practice in CBT were used as external standards of competency. Results: The scale has good internal consistency (the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 = 0.76). The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with experience in training and practice in cognitive behavioral therapy, and the number of relevant readings (Spearman's rho = 0.27, 0.28 and 0.44, respectively, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the total score of the scale and experience in general psychosocial care (Spearman's rho = -0.02, P = 0.76). The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis produced the area under curve (AUC) of 0.77 (SD = 0.05, P < 0.001), and a cutoff score of 31/32 produced sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64 to discriminate trainees who have experience of 40 h or more of CBT training and five or more of relevant readings, from those who do not meet this standard. Conclusion: The Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale was successfully validated. It has been demonstrated that the scale specifically assess knowledge in cognitive behavioral therapy. This scale would serve as a rough guide to assess competencies among beginner cognitive behavior therapists.

AB - Aim: This study aimed to test reliability and validity of the Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale, a self-rating scale that measures basic knowledge of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) concepts and methodology. Furthermore, we explored optimal cutoff score to demonstrate required standard of CBT competency. Methods: The reliability and validity of the scale was tested among 252 mental health professionals. The participants' number of readings relevant to CBT, as well as their experience in training and practice in CBT were used as external standards of competency. Results: The scale has good internal consistency (the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 = 0.76). The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with experience in training and practice in cognitive behavioral therapy, and the number of relevant readings (Spearman's rho = 0.27, 0.28 and 0.44, respectively, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the total score of the scale and experience in general psychosocial care (Spearman's rho = -0.02, P = 0.76). The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis produced the area under curve (AUC) of 0.77 (SD = 0.05, P < 0.001), and a cutoff score of 31/32 produced sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64 to discriminate trainees who have experience of 40 h or more of CBT training and five or more of relevant readings, from those who do not meet this standard. Conclusion: The Japanese-version Cognitive Therapy Awareness Scale was successfully validated. It has been demonstrated that the scale specifically assess knowledge in cognitive behavioral therapy. This scale would serve as a rough guide to assess competencies among beginner cognitive behavior therapists.

KW - cognitive behavioral therapy

KW - competency

KW - education in psychiatry

KW - psychotherapy

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251572330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251572330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02163.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02163.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21265937

AN - SCOPUS:79251572330

VL - 65

SP - 64

EP - 69

JO - Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

JF - Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

SN - 1323-1316

IS - 1

ER -