Review of gender research in cross-cultural psychology since 1990

Conceptual definitions and methodology

Atsuko Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in "Sex Roles" found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-172
Number of pages13
JournalShinrigaku Kenkyu
Volume75
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jun
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Spouses
Research
Sex Characteristics
Cultural Diversity
Fathers

Keywords

  • Conceptual definitions
  • Cross-cultural psychology
  • Etic and emic approaches
  • Gender
  • Methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Review of gender research in cross-cultural psychology since 1990 : Conceptual definitions and methodology. / Suzuki, Atsuko.

In: Shinrigaku Kenkyu, Vol. 75, No. 2, 06.2004, p. 160-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3919d3f559944df9a47bcaeda69b6f0a,
title = "Review of gender research in cross-cultural psychology since 1990: Conceptual definitions and methodology",
abstract = "A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in {"}Sex Roles{"} found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.",
keywords = "Conceptual definitions, Cross-cultural psychology, Etic and emic approaches, Gender, Methodology",
author = "Atsuko Suzuki",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "160--172",
journal = "Shinrigaku Kenkyu",
issn = "0021-5236",
publisher = "Japanese Psychological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of gender research in cross-cultural psychology since 1990

T2 - Conceptual definitions and methodology

AU - Suzuki, Atsuko

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in "Sex Roles" found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.

AB - A review of the cross-cultural research on gender in psychology since 1990 reveals (1) conceptual confusion of the definitions of sex, gender, man, and woman; (2) diversification, refinement, reification, and a problem-solving orientation in the research topics; and (3) the possibility of the elucidation of the psychological sex-difference mechanism in relation to the biological sex differences. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 cross-cultural psychological articles published in "Sex Roles" found that overall, the research is Western-centered and some methodological problems remain to be solved concerning the measures and the sampling. These findings lead to the following suggestions for cross-cultural research on gender to resolve the problems and contribute to the development of psychology in general: (1) use of an operational definition for conceptual equivalence; (2) conducting more etic-approach research; (3) avoiding ethnocentric or androcentric research attitudes; (4) use of a theoretical framework; (5) strict examination of methodologies; and (6) examination of the specific context of participants in terms of cultural diversity, dynamics of husband-wife relationships, and relationships with husbands and fathers.

KW - Conceptual definitions

KW - Cross-cultural psychology

KW - Etic and emic approaches

KW - Gender

KW - Methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15744384104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15744384104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 75

SP - 160

EP - 172

JO - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

JF - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

SN - 0021-5236

IS - 2

ER -