Rise time or rise rate: Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?

Y. Masakado, K. Akaboshi, A. Kimura, N. Chino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We measured the rise time (RT) and rise rate (RR) of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) when sharp sounds are heard in concentric EMG in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) and biceps brachii muscle (BIC) of normal subjects. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 85%, and those of more than 500μs were 15%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 65%, and those of more than 500μs were 35%. Distributions of the RR for FDI and BIC were also determined. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RR more than 0.3 mV/ms were 98.3%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 1.7%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RR of more than 0.3 mV/ms were 93%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 7%. We conclude it is better to use RR than RT when accepting MUAPs in clinical EMG, because even when sharp sounds are heard, MUAPs do not always have an RT of less than 500μs. The use of RT and the sharpness of MUAPs therefore need to be reconsidered, or RR should be used in clinical EMG by automatic program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-383
Number of pages3
JournalElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume40
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Action Potentials
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Rise time or rise rate : Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials? / Masakado, Y.; Akaboshi, K.; Kimura, A.; Chino, N.

In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2000, p. 381-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Masakado, Y. ; Akaboshi, K. ; Kimura, A. ; Chino, N. / Rise time or rise rate : Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?. In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 2000 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 381-383.
@article{0efa922682a44787ae5bcd96888f2815,
title = "Rise time or rise rate: Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?",
abstract = "We measured the rise time (RT) and rise rate (RR) of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) when sharp sounds are heard in concentric EMG in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) and biceps brachii muscle (BIC) of normal subjects. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 85{\%}, and those of more than 500μs were 15{\%}. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 65{\%}, and those of more than 500μs were 35{\%}. Distributions of the RR for FDI and BIC were also determined. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RR more than 0.3 mV/ms were 98.3{\%}, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 1.7{\%}. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RR of more than 0.3 mV/ms were 93{\%}, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 7{\%}. We conclude it is better to use RR than RT when accepting MUAPs in clinical EMG, because even when sharp sounds are heard, MUAPs do not always have an RT of less than 500μs. The use of RT and the sharpness of MUAPs therefore need to be reconsidered, or RR should be used in clinical EMG by automatic program.",
author = "Y. Masakado and K. Akaboshi and A. Kimura and N. Chino",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "381--383",
journal = "Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0301-150X",
publisher = "Editions Nauwelaerts SA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rise time or rise rate

T2 - Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?

AU - Masakado, Y.

AU - Akaboshi, K.

AU - Kimura, A.

AU - Chino, N.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We measured the rise time (RT) and rise rate (RR) of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) when sharp sounds are heard in concentric EMG in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) and biceps brachii muscle (BIC) of normal subjects. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 85%, and those of more than 500μs were 15%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 65%, and those of more than 500μs were 35%. Distributions of the RR for FDI and BIC were also determined. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RR more than 0.3 mV/ms were 98.3%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 1.7%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RR of more than 0.3 mV/ms were 93%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 7%. We conclude it is better to use RR than RT when accepting MUAPs in clinical EMG, because even when sharp sounds are heard, MUAPs do not always have an RT of less than 500μs. The use of RT and the sharpness of MUAPs therefore need to be reconsidered, or RR should be used in clinical EMG by automatic program.

AB - We measured the rise time (RT) and rise rate (RR) of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) when sharp sounds are heard in concentric EMG in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) and biceps brachii muscle (BIC) of normal subjects. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 85%, and those of more than 500μs were 15%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RT of less than 500μs were 65%, and those of more than 500μs were 35%. Distributions of the RR for FDI and BIC were also determined. MUAPs from FDI muscle with an RR more than 0.3 mV/ms were 98.3%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 1.7%. In contrast, MUAPs from BIC muscle with an RR of more than 0.3 mV/ms were 93%, and those of less than 0.3 mV/ms were 7%. We conclude it is better to use RR than RT when accepting MUAPs in clinical EMG, because even when sharp sounds are heard, MUAPs do not always have an RT of less than 500μs. The use of RT and the sharpness of MUAPs therefore need to be reconsidered, or RR should be used in clinical EMG by automatic program.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033798284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033798284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11039123

AN - SCOPUS:0033798284

VL - 40

SP - 381

EP - 383

JO - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0301-150X

IS - 6

ER -