Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis

Ken Ishii, Morio Matsumoto, Yuichiro Takahashi, Eijiro Okada, Koota Watanabe, Takashi Tsuji, Hironari Takaishi, Masaya Nakamura, Yoshiaki Toyama, Kazuhiro Chiba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective radiographic/imaging study. Objective: To evaluate preoperative and sequential postoperative radiographs following C1-C2 arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to determine risk factors for the development of subaxial subluxations (SAS). Summary of Background Data: The development of SAS has often been observed after C1-C2 arthrodesis. However, there have been no previous reports on the correlation between radiographic parameters and the incidence of postoperative SAS. Methods: The study group comprised of 58 patients with RA who underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis due to atlantoaxial subluxation. There were 5 men and 53 women with a mean age of 55.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 137 months. Nineteen patients with a postoperative SAS after C1-C2 arthrodesis were classified as the SAS+ group. Other 39 pat ents without a postoperative SAS were included in the SAS- group. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively and compared between the 2 groups. Results: The difference between pre- and postoperative atlantoaxial (AA) angles in the SAS+ group was significantly greater than those in the SAS- group (P = 0.039). The C2-C7 angles changed significantly between pre- and postoperative periods in the SAS+ group (P = 0.039), but not in the SAS- group (P = 0.897). It was suggested that a large AA angle and a small C2-C7 angle observed at the early postoperative period were the risk factors for the development of SAS. We also demonstrated that a high incidence of the C3-C4 SAS resulted from excessive bone fusion at the C2-C3. Conclusion: Excessive correction of AA angle is likely to cause loss of cervical lordosis, resulting in the development of postoperative SAS. In addition, extensive bony union at C2-C3 following C1-C2 arthrodesis frequently leads to the development of extensive SAS at the C3-C4.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1551-1555
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jul 15

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Postoperative Period
Preoperative Period
Lordosis
Incidence
Retrospective Studies
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • atlantoaxial arthrodesis
  • cervical spine
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • risk factors
  • subaxial subluxation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis. / Ishii, Ken; Matsumoto, Morio; Takahashi, Yuichiro; Okada, Eijiro; Watanabe, Koota; Tsuji, Takashi; Takaishi, Hironari; Nakamura, Masaya; Toyama, Yoshiaki; Chiba, Kazuhiro.

In: Spine, Vol. 35, No. 16, 15.07.2010, p. 1551-1555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ishii, Ken ; Matsumoto, Morio ; Takahashi, Yuichiro ; Okada, Eijiro ; Watanabe, Koota ; Tsuji, Takashi ; Takaishi, Hironari ; Nakamura, Masaya ; Toyama, Yoshiaki ; Chiba, Kazuhiro. / Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Spine. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 16. pp. 1551-1555.
@article{a5a52817e48b427b98938777c5127eeb,
title = "Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective radiographic/imaging study. Objective: To evaluate preoperative and sequential postoperative radiographs following C1-C2 arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to determine risk factors for the development of subaxial subluxations (SAS). Summary of Background Data: The development of SAS has often been observed after C1-C2 arthrodesis. However, there have been no previous reports on the correlation between radiographic parameters and the incidence of postoperative SAS. Methods: The study group comprised of 58 patients with RA who underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis due to atlantoaxial subluxation. There were 5 men and 53 women with a mean age of 55.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 137 months. Nineteen patients with a postoperative SAS after C1-C2 arthrodesis were classified as the SAS+ group. Other 39 pat ents without a postoperative SAS were included in the SAS- group. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively and compared between the 2 groups. Results: The difference between pre- and postoperative atlantoaxial (AA) angles in the SAS+ group was significantly greater than those in the SAS- group (P = 0.039). The C2-C7 angles changed significantly between pre- and postoperative periods in the SAS+ group (P = 0.039), but not in the SAS- group (P = 0.897). It was suggested that a large AA angle and a small C2-C7 angle observed at the early postoperative period were the risk factors for the development of SAS. We also demonstrated that a high incidence of the C3-C4 SAS resulted from excessive bone fusion at the C2-C3. Conclusion: Excessive correction of AA angle is likely to cause loss of cervical lordosis, resulting in the development of postoperative SAS. In addition, extensive bony union at C2-C3 following C1-C2 arthrodesis frequently leads to the development of extensive SAS at the C3-C4.",
keywords = "atlantoaxial arthrodesis, cervical spine, rheumatoid arthritis, risk factors, subaxial subluxation",
author = "Ken Ishii and Morio Matsumoto and Yuichiro Takahashi and Eijiro Okada and Koota Watanabe and Takashi Tsuji and Hironari Takaishi and Masaya Nakamura and Yoshiaki Toyama and Kazuhiro Chiba",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0d85",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1551--1555",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Ishii, Ken

AU - Matsumoto, Morio

AU - Takahashi, Yuichiro

AU - Okada, Eijiro

AU - Watanabe, Koota

AU - Tsuji, Takashi

AU - Takaishi, Hironari

AU - Nakamura, Masaya

AU - Toyama, Yoshiaki

AU - Chiba, Kazuhiro

PY - 2010/7/15

Y1 - 2010/7/15

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective radiographic/imaging study. Objective: To evaluate preoperative and sequential postoperative radiographs following C1-C2 arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to determine risk factors for the development of subaxial subluxations (SAS). Summary of Background Data: The development of SAS has often been observed after C1-C2 arthrodesis. However, there have been no previous reports on the correlation between radiographic parameters and the incidence of postoperative SAS. Methods: The study group comprised of 58 patients with RA who underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis due to atlantoaxial subluxation. There were 5 men and 53 women with a mean age of 55.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 137 months. Nineteen patients with a postoperative SAS after C1-C2 arthrodesis were classified as the SAS+ group. Other 39 pat ents without a postoperative SAS were included in the SAS- group. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively and compared between the 2 groups. Results: The difference between pre- and postoperative atlantoaxial (AA) angles in the SAS+ group was significantly greater than those in the SAS- group (P = 0.039). The C2-C7 angles changed significantly between pre- and postoperative periods in the SAS+ group (P = 0.039), but not in the SAS- group (P = 0.897). It was suggested that a large AA angle and a small C2-C7 angle observed at the early postoperative period were the risk factors for the development of SAS. We also demonstrated that a high incidence of the C3-C4 SAS resulted from excessive bone fusion at the C2-C3. Conclusion: Excessive correction of AA angle is likely to cause loss of cervical lordosis, resulting in the development of postoperative SAS. In addition, extensive bony union at C2-C3 following C1-C2 arthrodesis frequently leads to the development of extensive SAS at the C3-C4.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective radiographic/imaging study. Objective: To evaluate preoperative and sequential postoperative radiographs following C1-C2 arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to determine risk factors for the development of subaxial subluxations (SAS). Summary of Background Data: The development of SAS has often been observed after C1-C2 arthrodesis. However, there have been no previous reports on the correlation between radiographic parameters and the incidence of postoperative SAS. Methods: The study group comprised of 58 patients with RA who underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis due to atlantoaxial subluxation. There were 5 men and 53 women with a mean age of 55.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 137 months. Nineteen patients with a postoperative SAS after C1-C2 arthrodesis were classified as the SAS+ group. Other 39 pat ents without a postoperative SAS were included in the SAS- group. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively and compared between the 2 groups. Results: The difference between pre- and postoperative atlantoaxial (AA) angles in the SAS+ group was significantly greater than those in the SAS- group (P = 0.039). The C2-C7 angles changed significantly between pre- and postoperative periods in the SAS+ group (P = 0.039), but not in the SAS- group (P = 0.897). It was suggested that a large AA angle and a small C2-C7 angle observed at the early postoperative period were the risk factors for the development of SAS. We also demonstrated that a high incidence of the C3-C4 SAS resulted from excessive bone fusion at the C2-C3. Conclusion: Excessive correction of AA angle is likely to cause loss of cervical lordosis, resulting in the development of postoperative SAS. In addition, extensive bony union at C2-C3 following C1-C2 arthrodesis frequently leads to the development of extensive SAS at the C3-C4.

KW - atlantoaxial arthrodesis

KW - cervical spine

KW - rheumatoid arthritis

KW - risk factors

KW - subaxial subluxation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955007003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955007003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0d85

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0d85

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1551

EP - 1555

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 16

ER -