Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference

Seiki Konishi, Takamitsu Watanabe, Koji Jimura, Junichi Chikazoe, Satoshi Hirose, Hiroko M. Kimura, Yasushi Miyashita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of "dual-match" stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-745
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proactive Inhibition
Motor Cortex
Task Performance and Analysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Konishi, S., Watanabe, T., Jimura, K., Chikazoe, J., Hirose, S., Kimura, H. M., & Miyashita, Y. (2011). Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21480

Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference. / Konishi, Seiki; Watanabe, Takamitsu; Jimura, Koji; Chikazoe, Junichi; Hirose, Satoshi; Kimura, Hiroko M.; Miyashita, Yasushi.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 737-745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Konishi, S, Watanabe, T, Jimura, K, Chikazoe, J, Hirose, S, Kimura, HM & Miyashita, Y 2011, 'Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference', Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21480
Konishi, Seiki ; Watanabe, Takamitsu ; Jimura, Koji ; Chikazoe, Junichi ; Hirose, Satoshi ; Kimura, Hiroko M. ; Miyashita, Yasushi. / Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 737-745.
@article{faa8093890c44e11a0907a06b0776dde,
title = "Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference",
abstract = "Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of {"}dual-match{"} stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.",
author = "Seiki Konishi and Takamitsu Watanabe and Koji Jimura and Junichi Chikazoe and Satoshi Hirose and Kimura, {Hiroko M.} and Yasushi Miyashita",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1162/jocn.2010.21480",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "737--745",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role for presupplementary motor area in inhibition of cognitive set interference

AU - Konishi, Seiki

AU - Watanabe, Takamitsu

AU - Jimura, Koji

AU - Chikazoe, Junichi

AU - Hirose, Satoshi

AU - Kimura, Hiroko M.

AU - Miyashita, Yasushi

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of "dual-match" stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.

AB - Proactive interference (PI), which is formed through repetition of certain behavior and lasts for a while, needs to be inhibited in order for subsequent behavior to prevail over the antecedent one. Although the inhibitory mechanisms in the pFC have been reported that are recruited long after one behavior is updated to another, very little is known about the inhibitorymechanisms that are recruited immediately after the update. The WCST was modified in the present fMRI study such that inhibition of PI could be examined both immediately after and long after update of behavior. Use of "dual-match" stimuli allowed us to compare two types of trials where inhibition of PI was and was not required (control and release trials, respectively). Significant activation was observed in the left pre-SMA during control versus release trials. The pre-SMA activation was selective to PI inhibition required immediately after update of behavior, which exhibited marked contrast to the left anterior prefrontal activation selective to PI inhibition required long after the update. These results reveal dissociable inhibitory mechanisms in these two regions that are recruited in the different temporal contexts of the inhibitory demands imposed during performance of the task.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650317056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650317056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21480

DO - 10.1162/jocn.2010.21480

M3 - Article

C2 - 20350186

AN - SCOPUS:78650317056

VL - 23

SP - 737

EP - 745

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 3

ER -