Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection

Daisuke Kikuchi, Toshiro Iizuka, Shu Hoteya, Akihiro Yamada, Tsukasa Furuhata, Satoshi Yamashita, Kaoru Domon, Masanori Nakamura, Akira Matsui, Toshifumi Mitani, Osamu Ogawa, Sumio Watanabe, Naohisa Yahagi, Mitsuru Kaise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: In endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), misdiagnosis of the tumor margin may lead to residual carcinoma, which we treat by secondary ESD (sESD) for local control. Methods: 1,458 lesions of early gastric carcinoma were treated by ESD between July 2006 and November 2011. 33 lesions were resected with positive lateral margins. Among them, 13 patients were treated by surgery, 12 patients were followed up, and 8 patients were treated by sESD. sESD was defined as resection of residual carcinoma surrounding the ulcer of primary ESD (pESD). Safety and efficacy of sESD were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Mean interval between two ESDs was 8.4 days. The mean specimen area was 14.9 cm2 in pESD and 23.9 cm2 in sESD. The mean procedure time was 107.3 and 193.0 min, and mean dissection area was 15.9 and 11.6 mm2/min, respectively. There were no significant differences and no serious complications occurred during sESD. There was no local recurrence after a mean follow-up period of 896 days. Meanwhile, 4 cases of local recurrence were detected after ESD with a positive lateral margin. Conclusion: The results suggest that sESD may be technically feasible and favorable for local control of residual gastric carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-293
Number of pages6
JournalDigestion
Volume86
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan

Fingerprint

Gastric Stump
Carcinoma
Safety
Recurrence
Diagnostic Errors
Ulcer
Dissection
Stomach
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Early gastric carcinoma
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • Local recurrence
  • Residual carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection. / Kikuchi, Daisuke; Iizuka, Toshiro; Hoteya, Shu; Yamada, Akihiro; Furuhata, Tsukasa; Yamashita, Satoshi; Domon, Kaoru; Nakamura, Masanori; Matsui, Akira; Mitani, Toshifumi; Ogawa, Osamu; Watanabe, Sumio; Yahagi, Naohisa; Kaise, Mitsuru.

In: Digestion, Vol. 86, No. 4, 01.2013, p. 288-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kikuchi, D, Iizuka, T, Hoteya, S, Yamada, A, Furuhata, T, Yamashita, S, Domon, K, Nakamura, M, Matsui, A, Mitani, T, Ogawa, O, Watanabe, S, Yahagi, N & Kaise, M 2013, 'Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection', Digestion, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342114
Kikuchi, Daisuke ; Iizuka, Toshiro ; Hoteya, Shu ; Yamada, Akihiro ; Furuhata, Tsukasa ; Yamashita, Satoshi ; Domon, Kaoru ; Nakamura, Masanori ; Matsui, Akira ; Mitani, Toshifumi ; Ogawa, Osamu ; Watanabe, Sumio ; Yahagi, Naohisa ; Kaise, Mitsuru. / Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection. In: Digestion. 2013 ; Vol. 86, No. 4. pp. 288-293.
@article{59d98c32cf404213b89480916be041a5,
title = "Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection",
abstract = "Background/Aims: In endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), misdiagnosis of the tumor margin may lead to residual carcinoma, which we treat by secondary ESD (sESD) for local control. Methods: 1,458 lesions of early gastric carcinoma were treated by ESD between July 2006 and November 2011. 33 lesions were resected with positive lateral margins. Among them, 13 patients were treated by surgery, 12 patients were followed up, and 8 patients were treated by sESD. sESD was defined as resection of residual carcinoma surrounding the ulcer of primary ESD (pESD). Safety and efficacy of sESD were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Mean interval between two ESDs was 8.4 days. The mean specimen area was 14.9 cm2 in pESD and 23.9 cm2 in sESD. The mean procedure time was 107.3 and 193.0 min, and mean dissection area was 15.9 and 11.6 mm2/min, respectively. There were no significant differences and no serious complications occurred during sESD. There was no local recurrence after a mean follow-up period of 896 days. Meanwhile, 4 cases of local recurrence were detected after ESD with a positive lateral margin. Conclusion: The results suggest that sESD may be technically feasible and favorable for local control of residual gastric carcinoma.",
keywords = "Early gastric carcinoma, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Local recurrence, Residual carcinoma",
author = "Daisuke Kikuchi and Toshiro Iizuka and Shu Hoteya and Akihiro Yamada and Tsukasa Furuhata and Satoshi Yamashita and Kaoru Domon and Masanori Nakamura and Akira Matsui and Toshifumi Mitani and Osamu Ogawa and Sumio Watanabe and Naohisa Yahagi and Mitsuru Kaise",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000342114",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "288--293",
journal = "Digestion",
issn = "0012-2823",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric carcinoma after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection

AU - Kikuchi, Daisuke

AU - Iizuka, Toshiro

AU - Hoteya, Shu

AU - Yamada, Akihiro

AU - Furuhata, Tsukasa

AU - Yamashita, Satoshi

AU - Domon, Kaoru

AU - Nakamura, Masanori

AU - Matsui, Akira

AU - Mitani, Toshifumi

AU - Ogawa, Osamu

AU - Watanabe, Sumio

AU - Yahagi, Naohisa

AU - Kaise, Mitsuru

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Background/Aims: In endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), misdiagnosis of the tumor margin may lead to residual carcinoma, which we treat by secondary ESD (sESD) for local control. Methods: 1,458 lesions of early gastric carcinoma were treated by ESD between July 2006 and November 2011. 33 lesions were resected with positive lateral margins. Among them, 13 patients were treated by surgery, 12 patients were followed up, and 8 patients were treated by sESD. sESD was defined as resection of residual carcinoma surrounding the ulcer of primary ESD (pESD). Safety and efficacy of sESD were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Mean interval between two ESDs was 8.4 days. The mean specimen area was 14.9 cm2 in pESD and 23.9 cm2 in sESD. The mean procedure time was 107.3 and 193.0 min, and mean dissection area was 15.9 and 11.6 mm2/min, respectively. There were no significant differences and no serious complications occurred during sESD. There was no local recurrence after a mean follow-up period of 896 days. Meanwhile, 4 cases of local recurrence were detected after ESD with a positive lateral margin. Conclusion: The results suggest that sESD may be technically feasible and favorable for local control of residual gastric carcinoma.

AB - Background/Aims: In endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), misdiagnosis of the tumor margin may lead to residual carcinoma, which we treat by secondary ESD (sESD) for local control. Methods: 1,458 lesions of early gastric carcinoma were treated by ESD between July 2006 and November 2011. 33 lesions were resected with positive lateral margins. Among them, 13 patients were treated by surgery, 12 patients were followed up, and 8 patients were treated by sESD. sESD was defined as resection of residual carcinoma surrounding the ulcer of primary ESD (pESD). Safety and efficacy of sESD were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Mean interval between two ESDs was 8.4 days. The mean specimen area was 14.9 cm2 in pESD and 23.9 cm2 in sESD. The mean procedure time was 107.3 and 193.0 min, and mean dissection area was 15.9 and 11.6 mm2/min, respectively. There were no significant differences and no serious complications occurred during sESD. There was no local recurrence after a mean follow-up period of 896 days. Meanwhile, 4 cases of local recurrence were detected after ESD with a positive lateral margin. Conclusion: The results suggest that sESD may be technically feasible and favorable for local control of residual gastric carcinoma.

KW - Early gastric carcinoma

KW - Endoscopic submucosal dissection

KW - Local recurrence

KW - Residual carcinoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867228718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867228718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000342114

DO - 10.1159/000342114

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 288

EP - 293

JO - Digestion

JF - Digestion

SN - 0012-2823

IS - 4

ER -