Safety of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to body mass index: A report from a Japanese multicenter registry

Yohei Numasawa, Shun Kosaka, Hiroaki Miyata, Akio Kawamura, Shigetaka Noma, Masahiro Suzuki, Susumu Nakagawa, Yukihiko Momiyama, Yuji Sato, Keiichi Fukuda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is commonly performed in Japan, but its efficacy may differ from that in Western countries, particularly given the smaller body habitus of Japanese patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of TRI with those of transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI) and evaluated their relationship with body mass index in a multicenter registry. We analyzed data from 1230 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI 306, TFI 924) at 14 Japanese hospitals from September 2008 to August 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio regarding complications between TRI and TFI. Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences in TRI and TFI, extracting 274 matched patients from each group for comparisons. The overall complication rate was significantly lower (10. 8 vs. 18. 0 %, p = 0. 003) and the bleeding complication rate trended lower (4. 6 vs. 7. 6 %, p = 0. 088) in TRI than in TFI. TRI was moderately associated with a smaller bleeding risk after multivariable adjustment (OR 0. 54; p = 0. 072). After propensity score matching, TRI was associated with significantly lower complication rates compared with TFI (9. 5 vs. 18. 2 %, p = 0. 003), especially bleeding complications (3. 3 vs. 9. 9 %, p = 0. 002) and puncture site bleeding (1. 1 vs. 5. 5 %, p = 0. 004). Notably, bleeding rate was inversely related to body mass index in both groups. TRI appeared to be a safe alternative to TFI in this Japanese real-world multicenter registry, which includes high numbers of TRI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-156
Number of pages9
JournalCardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Registries
Body Mass Index
Hemorrhage
Safety
Propensity Score
Punctures
Japan
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Transradial catheterization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Safety of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to body mass index : A report from a Japanese multicenter registry. / Numasawa, Yohei; Kosaka, Shun; Miyata, Hiroaki; Kawamura, Akio; Noma, Shigetaka; Suzuki, Masahiro; Nakagawa, Susumu; Momiyama, Yukihiko; Sato, Yuji; Fukuda, Keiichi.

In: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2013, p. 148-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Numasawa, Yohei ; Kosaka, Shun ; Miyata, Hiroaki ; Kawamura, Akio ; Noma, Shigetaka ; Suzuki, Masahiro ; Nakagawa, Susumu ; Momiyama, Yukihiko ; Sato, Yuji ; Fukuda, Keiichi. / Safety of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to body mass index : A report from a Japanese multicenter registry. In: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 148-156.
@article{8407a24cf2ea4902adbd70b144067e3f,
title = "Safety of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to body mass index: A report from a Japanese multicenter registry",
abstract = "Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is commonly performed in Japan, but its efficacy may differ from that in Western countries, particularly given the smaller body habitus of Japanese patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of TRI with those of transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI) and evaluated their relationship with body mass index in a multicenter registry. We analyzed data from 1230 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI 306, TFI 924) at 14 Japanese hospitals from September 2008 to August 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio regarding complications between TRI and TFI. Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences in TRI and TFI, extracting 274 matched patients from each group for comparisons. The overall complication rate was significantly lower (10. 8 vs. 18. 0 {\%}, p = 0. 003) and the bleeding complication rate trended lower (4. 6 vs. 7. 6 {\%}, p = 0. 088) in TRI than in TFI. TRI was moderately associated with a smaller bleeding risk after multivariable adjustment (OR 0. 54; p = 0. 072). After propensity score matching, TRI was associated with significantly lower complication rates compared with TFI (9. 5 vs. 18. 2 {\%}, p = 0. 003), especially bleeding complications (3. 3 vs. 9. 9 {\%}, p = 0. 002) and puncture site bleeding (1. 1 vs. 5. 5 {\%}, p = 0. 004). Notably, bleeding rate was inversely related to body mass index in both groups. TRI appeared to be a safe alternative to TFI in this Japanese real-world multicenter registry, which includes high numbers of TRI.",
keywords = "Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Transradial catheterization",
author = "Yohei Numasawa and Shun Kosaka and Hiroaki Miyata and Akio Kawamura and Shigetaka Noma and Masahiro Suzuki and Susumu Nakagawa and Yukihiko Momiyama and Yuji Sato and Keiichi Fukuda",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s12928-012-0138-8",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "148--156",
journal = "Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics",
issn = "1868-4300",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to body mass index

T2 - A report from a Japanese multicenter registry

AU - Numasawa, Yohei

AU - Kosaka, Shun

AU - Miyata, Hiroaki

AU - Kawamura, Akio

AU - Noma, Shigetaka

AU - Suzuki, Masahiro

AU - Nakagawa, Susumu

AU - Momiyama, Yukihiko

AU - Sato, Yuji

AU - Fukuda, Keiichi

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is commonly performed in Japan, but its efficacy may differ from that in Western countries, particularly given the smaller body habitus of Japanese patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of TRI with those of transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI) and evaluated their relationship with body mass index in a multicenter registry. We analyzed data from 1230 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI 306, TFI 924) at 14 Japanese hospitals from September 2008 to August 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio regarding complications between TRI and TFI. Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences in TRI and TFI, extracting 274 matched patients from each group for comparisons. The overall complication rate was significantly lower (10. 8 vs. 18. 0 %, p = 0. 003) and the bleeding complication rate trended lower (4. 6 vs. 7. 6 %, p = 0. 088) in TRI than in TFI. TRI was moderately associated with a smaller bleeding risk after multivariable adjustment (OR 0. 54; p = 0. 072). After propensity score matching, TRI was associated with significantly lower complication rates compared with TFI (9. 5 vs. 18. 2 %, p = 0. 003), especially bleeding complications (3. 3 vs. 9. 9 %, p = 0. 002) and puncture site bleeding (1. 1 vs. 5. 5 %, p = 0. 004). Notably, bleeding rate was inversely related to body mass index in both groups. TRI appeared to be a safe alternative to TFI in this Japanese real-world multicenter registry, which includes high numbers of TRI.

AB - Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is commonly performed in Japan, but its efficacy may differ from that in Western countries, particularly given the smaller body habitus of Japanese patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of TRI with those of transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI) and evaluated their relationship with body mass index in a multicenter registry. We analyzed data from 1230 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI 306, TFI 924) at 14 Japanese hospitals from September 2008 to August 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio regarding complications between TRI and TFI. Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences in TRI and TFI, extracting 274 matched patients from each group for comparisons. The overall complication rate was significantly lower (10. 8 vs. 18. 0 %, p = 0. 003) and the bleeding complication rate trended lower (4. 6 vs. 7. 6 %, p = 0. 088) in TRI than in TFI. TRI was moderately associated with a smaller bleeding risk after multivariable adjustment (OR 0. 54; p = 0. 072). After propensity score matching, TRI was associated with significantly lower complication rates compared with TFI (9. 5 vs. 18. 2 %, p = 0. 003), especially bleeding complications (3. 3 vs. 9. 9 %, p = 0. 002) and puncture site bleeding (1. 1 vs. 5. 5 %, p = 0. 004). Notably, bleeding rate was inversely related to body mass index in both groups. TRI appeared to be a safe alternative to TFI in this Japanese real-world multicenter registry, which includes high numbers of TRI.

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - Transradial catheterization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876047731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876047731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12928-012-0138-8

DO - 10.1007/s12928-012-0138-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 23054968

AN - SCOPUS:84876047731

VL - 28

SP - 148

EP - 156

JO - Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics

JF - Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics

SN - 1868-4300

IS - 2

ER -