Sample size calculations for single-arm survival studies using transformations of the Kaplan–Meier estimator

Kengo Nagashima, Hisashi Noma, Yasunori Sato, Masahiko Gosho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In single-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes, the Kaplan–Meier estimator and its confidence interval are widely used to assess survival probability and median survival time. Since the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan–Meier estimator is a common result, the sample size calculation methods have not been studied in depth. An existing sample size calculation method is founded on the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan–Meier estimator using the log transformation. However, the small sample properties of the log transformed estimator are quite poor in small sample sizes (which are typical situations in single-arm trials), and the existing method uses an inappropriate standard normal approximation to calculate sample sizes. These issues can seriously influence the accuracy of results. In this paper, we propose alternative methods to determine sample sizes based on a valid standard normal approximation with several transformations that may give an accurate normal approximation even with small sample sizes. In numerical evaluations via simulations, some of the proposed methods provided more accurate results, and the empirical power of the proposed method with the arcsine square-root transformation tended to be closer to a prescribed power than the other transformations. These results were supported when methods were applied to data from three clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPharmaceutical Statistics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • confidence intervals
  • Kaplan–Meier estimator
  • one sample test
  • sample size
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sample size calculations for single-arm survival studies using transformations of the Kaplan–Meier estimator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this