Scientific misconduct and social media

Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal

Yuya Sugawara, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Shoko Miyagawa, Masayasu Murakami, Atsushi Tsuya, Atsushi Tanaka, Masahiro Kami, Hiroto Narimatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The academic scandal on a study on stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells in Japan in 2014 involved suspicions of scientific misconduct by the lead author of the study after the paper had been reviewed on a peer-review website. This study investigated the discussions on STAP cells on Twitter and content of newspaper articles in an attempt to assess the role of social compared with traditional media in scientific peer review. Objective: This study examined Twitter utilization in scientific peer review on STAP cells misconduct. Methods: Searches for tweets and newspaper articles containing the term "STAP cells" were carried out through Twitter's search engine and Nikkei Telecom database, respectively. The search period was from January 1 to July 1, 2014. The nouns appearing in the "top tweets" and newspaper articles were extracted through a morphological analysis, and their frequency of appearance and changes over time were investigated. Results: The total numbers of top tweets and newspaper articles containing the term were 134,958 and 1646, respectively. Negative words concerning STAP cells began to appear on Twitter by February 9-15, 2014, or 3 weeks after Obokata presented a paper on STAP cells. The number of negative words in newspaper articles gradually increased beginning in the week of March 12-18, 2014. A total of 1000 tweets were randomly selected, and they were found to contain STAP-related opinions (43.3%, 433/1000), links to news sites and other sources (41.4%, 414/1000), false scientific or medical claims (8.9%, 89/1000), and topics unrelated to STAP (6.4%, 64/1000). Conclusions: The discussion on scientific misconduct during the STAP cells scandal took place at an earlier stage on Twitter than in newspapers, a traditional medium.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere57
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Scientific Misconduct
Social Media
Newspapers
Peer Review
Search Engine
Japan
Databases

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Internet
  • Mass media
  • Web 2.0

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Scientific misconduct and social media : Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal. / Sugawara, Yuya; Tanimoto, Tetsuya; Miyagawa, Shoko; Murakami, Masayasu; Tsuya, Atsushi; Tanaka, Atsushi; Kami, Masahiro; Narimatsu, Hiroto.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, e57, 01.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sugawara, Yuya ; Tanimoto, Tetsuya ; Miyagawa, Shoko ; Murakami, Masayasu ; Tsuya, Atsushi ; Tanaka, Atsushi ; Kami, Masahiro ; Narimatsu, Hiroto. / Scientific misconduct and social media : Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 2.
@article{26a52227cc6445889d3f3d5992f77888,
title = "Scientific misconduct and social media: Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal",
abstract = "Background: The academic scandal on a study on stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells in Japan in 2014 involved suspicions of scientific misconduct by the lead author of the study after the paper had been reviewed on a peer-review website. This study investigated the discussions on STAP cells on Twitter and content of newspaper articles in an attempt to assess the role of social compared with traditional media in scientific peer review. Objective: This study examined Twitter utilization in scientific peer review on STAP cells misconduct. Methods: Searches for tweets and newspaper articles containing the term {"}STAP cells{"} were carried out through Twitter's search engine and Nikkei Telecom database, respectively. The search period was from January 1 to July 1, 2014. The nouns appearing in the {"}top tweets{"} and newspaper articles were extracted through a morphological analysis, and their frequency of appearance and changes over time were investigated. Results: The total numbers of top tweets and newspaper articles containing the term were 134,958 and 1646, respectively. Negative words concerning STAP cells began to appear on Twitter by February 9-15, 2014, or 3 weeks after Obokata presented a paper on STAP cells. The number of negative words in newspaper articles gradually increased beginning in the week of March 12-18, 2014. A total of 1000 tweets were randomly selected, and they were found to contain STAP-related opinions (43.3{\%}, 433/1000), links to news sites and other sources (41.4{\%}, 414/1000), false scientific or medical claims (8.9{\%}, 89/1000), and topics unrelated to STAP (6.4{\%}, 64/1000). Conclusions: The discussion on scientific misconduct during the STAP cells scandal took place at an earlier stage on Twitter than in newspapers, a traditional medium.",
keywords = "Bioethics, Internet, Mass media, Web 2.0",
author = "Yuya Sugawara and Tetsuya Tanimoto and Shoko Miyagawa and Masayasu Murakami and Atsushi Tsuya and Atsushi Tanaka and Masahiro Kami and Hiroto Narimatsu",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.6706",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific misconduct and social media

T2 - Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal

AU - Sugawara, Yuya

AU - Tanimoto, Tetsuya

AU - Miyagawa, Shoko

AU - Murakami, Masayasu

AU - Tsuya, Atsushi

AU - Tanaka, Atsushi

AU - Kami, Masahiro

AU - Narimatsu, Hiroto

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background: The academic scandal on a study on stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells in Japan in 2014 involved suspicions of scientific misconduct by the lead author of the study after the paper had been reviewed on a peer-review website. This study investigated the discussions on STAP cells on Twitter and content of newspaper articles in an attempt to assess the role of social compared with traditional media in scientific peer review. Objective: This study examined Twitter utilization in scientific peer review on STAP cells misconduct. Methods: Searches for tweets and newspaper articles containing the term "STAP cells" were carried out through Twitter's search engine and Nikkei Telecom database, respectively. The search period was from January 1 to July 1, 2014. The nouns appearing in the "top tweets" and newspaper articles were extracted through a morphological analysis, and their frequency of appearance and changes over time were investigated. Results: The total numbers of top tweets and newspaper articles containing the term were 134,958 and 1646, respectively. Negative words concerning STAP cells began to appear on Twitter by February 9-15, 2014, or 3 weeks after Obokata presented a paper on STAP cells. The number of negative words in newspaper articles gradually increased beginning in the week of March 12-18, 2014. A total of 1000 tweets were randomly selected, and they were found to contain STAP-related opinions (43.3%, 433/1000), links to news sites and other sources (41.4%, 414/1000), false scientific or medical claims (8.9%, 89/1000), and topics unrelated to STAP (6.4%, 64/1000). Conclusions: The discussion on scientific misconduct during the STAP cells scandal took place at an earlier stage on Twitter than in newspapers, a traditional medium.

AB - Background: The academic scandal on a study on stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells in Japan in 2014 involved suspicions of scientific misconduct by the lead author of the study after the paper had been reviewed on a peer-review website. This study investigated the discussions on STAP cells on Twitter and content of newspaper articles in an attempt to assess the role of social compared with traditional media in scientific peer review. Objective: This study examined Twitter utilization in scientific peer review on STAP cells misconduct. Methods: Searches for tweets and newspaper articles containing the term "STAP cells" were carried out through Twitter's search engine and Nikkei Telecom database, respectively. The search period was from January 1 to July 1, 2014. The nouns appearing in the "top tweets" and newspaper articles were extracted through a morphological analysis, and their frequency of appearance and changes over time were investigated. Results: The total numbers of top tweets and newspaper articles containing the term were 134,958 and 1646, respectively. Negative words concerning STAP cells began to appear on Twitter by February 9-15, 2014, or 3 weeks after Obokata presented a paper on STAP cells. The number of negative words in newspaper articles gradually increased beginning in the week of March 12-18, 2014. A total of 1000 tweets were randomly selected, and they were found to contain STAP-related opinions (43.3%, 433/1000), links to news sites and other sources (41.4%, 414/1000), false scientific or medical claims (8.9%, 89/1000), and topics unrelated to STAP (6.4%, 64/1000). Conclusions: The discussion on scientific misconduct during the STAP cells scandal took place at an earlier stage on Twitter than in newspapers, a traditional medium.

KW - Bioethics

KW - Internet

KW - Mass media

KW - Web 2.0

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014859906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014859906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.6706

DO - 10.2196/jmir.6706

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 2

M1 - e57

ER -