Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments

Hajime Tazaki, Rodney D Van Meter, Ryuji Wakikawa, Thirapon Wongsaardsakul, Kanchana Kanchanasut, Marcelo Dias De Amorim, Jun Murai

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks
Pages101-107
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Event6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, PE-WASUN'09 - Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
Duration: 2009 Oct 282009 Oct 29

Other

Other6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, PE-WASUN'09
CountrySpain
CityTenerife, Canary Islands
Period09/10/2809/10/29

Fingerprint

Routing protocols
Network protocols
Experiments
Routers
Disasters
Analytical models

Keywords

  • Field experiments
  • MANEMO
  • Routing
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Tazaki, H., Van Meter, R. D., Wakikawa, R., Wongsaardsakul, T., Kanchanasut, K., Dias De Amorim, M., & Murai, J. (2009). Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments. In PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks (pp. 101-107) https://doi.org/10.1145/1641876.1641895

Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments. / Tazaki, Hajime; Van Meter, Rodney D; Wakikawa, Ryuji; Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon; Kanchanasut, Kanchana; Dias De Amorim, Marcelo; Murai, Jun.

PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks. 2009. p. 101-107.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Tazaki, H, Van Meter, RD, Wakikawa, R, Wongsaardsakul, T, Kanchanasut, K, Dias De Amorim, M & Murai, J 2009, Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments. in PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks. pp. 101-107, 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, PE-WASUN'09, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 09/10/28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1641876.1641895
Tazaki H, Van Meter RD, Wakikawa R, Wongsaardsakul T, Kanchanasut K, Dias De Amorim M et al. Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments. In PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks. 2009. p. 101-107 https://doi.org/10.1145/1641876.1641895
Tazaki, Hajime ; Van Meter, Rodney D ; Wakikawa, Ryuji ; Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon ; Kanchanasut, Kanchana ; Dias De Amorim, Marcelo ; Murai, Jun. / Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments. PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks. 2009. pp. 101-107
@inproceedings{e621db144a2146e680385d3440df382a,
title = "Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments",
abstract = "Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.",
keywords = "Field experiments, MANEMO, Routing, Simulation",
author = "Hajime Tazaki and {Van Meter}, {Rodney D} and Ryuji Wakikawa and Thirapon Wongsaardsakul and Kanchana Kanchanasut and {Dias De Amorim}, Marcelo and Jun Murai",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1145/1641876.1641895",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781605586182",
pages = "101--107",
booktitle = "PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Selecting an appropriate routing protocol for in-field MANEMO experiments

AU - Tazaki, Hajime

AU - Van Meter, Rodney D

AU - Wakikawa, Ryuji

AU - Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon

AU - Kanchanasut, Kanchana

AU - Dias De Amorim, Marcelo

AU - Murai, Jun

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.

AB - Despite years of research in ad hoc routing protocols, only a few have been investigated in the context of MANEMO (MANET for NEMO), which provides a hierarchical structured network and global connectivity. Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMOs composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through analytical models, simulation, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when nodes perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR in the case of sparse networks, which corresponds to the operation point of our target scenario.

KW - Field experiments

KW - MANEMO

KW - Routing

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049117984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049117984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1641876.1641895

DO - 10.1145/1641876.1641895

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781605586182

SP - 101

EP - 107

BT - PE-WASUN'09 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad-Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks

ER -