Senders’ Bias

How Can Top Managers’ Communication Improve or Not Improve Strategy Implementation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As environmental change accelerates and future uncertainty increases, implementation of strategy inherently involves continuous adjustment and modification. To meet the need for further research on the critical role of communication, this article contributes to the literature by examining the relationship between communication and strategy implementation. I propose that senders’ bias, which refers to the overestimation of the quality of communication (i.e., degree of sharing) with organizational members by senders (i.e., top managers), is a fundamental implementation problem. Thus, top managers’ perceived degree of communication with organizational members is expected to have limited effects on the degree of value sharing and resulting effectiveness of strategy implementation up to a certain threshold point. Additionally, I argue that the relationship between top managers’ perceived degree of communication and strategy implementation are moderated by the type of communication (i.e., whether storytelling is used in the communication), communication medium (i.e., the use of e-mails), and top managers’ openness to the voices of organizational members. The idea of senders’ bias should provide insights into why many organizations struggle with strategy implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-69
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Business Communication
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Communication
Managers
Strategy implementation
Openness
Environmental change
Electronic mail
Uncertainty
Storytelling
Communication media

Keywords

  • management biases
  • strategy implementation
  • Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{dae260e15a8c417fb87c4e8c9ddd1156,
title = "Senders’ Bias: How Can Top Managers’ Communication Improve or Not Improve Strategy Implementation?",
abstract = "As environmental change accelerates and future uncertainty increases, implementation of strategy inherently involves continuous adjustment and modification. To meet the need for further research on the critical role of communication, this article contributes to the literature by examining the relationship between communication and strategy implementation. I propose that senders’ bias, which refers to the overestimation of the quality of communication (i.e., degree of sharing) with organizational members by senders (i.e., top managers), is a fundamental implementation problem. Thus, top managers’ perceived degree of communication with organizational members is expected to have limited effects on the degree of value sharing and resulting effectiveness of strategy implementation up to a certain threshold point. Additionally, I argue that the relationship between top managers’ perceived degree of communication and strategy implementation are moderated by the type of communication (i.e., whether storytelling is used in the communication), communication medium (i.e., the use of e-mails), and top managers’ openness to the voices of organizational members. The idea of senders’ bias should provide insights into why many organizations struggle with strategy implementation.",
keywords = "management biases, strategy implementation, Voice",
author = "Katsuhiko Shimizu",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2329488416675449",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "52--69",
journal = "International Journal of Business Communication",
issn = "2329-4884",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Senders’ Bias

T2 - How Can Top Managers’ Communication Improve or Not Improve Strategy Implementation?

AU - Shimizu, Katsuhiko

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - As environmental change accelerates and future uncertainty increases, implementation of strategy inherently involves continuous adjustment and modification. To meet the need for further research on the critical role of communication, this article contributes to the literature by examining the relationship between communication and strategy implementation. I propose that senders’ bias, which refers to the overestimation of the quality of communication (i.e., degree of sharing) with organizational members by senders (i.e., top managers), is a fundamental implementation problem. Thus, top managers’ perceived degree of communication with organizational members is expected to have limited effects on the degree of value sharing and resulting effectiveness of strategy implementation up to a certain threshold point. Additionally, I argue that the relationship between top managers’ perceived degree of communication and strategy implementation are moderated by the type of communication (i.e., whether storytelling is used in the communication), communication medium (i.e., the use of e-mails), and top managers’ openness to the voices of organizational members. The idea of senders’ bias should provide insights into why many organizations struggle with strategy implementation.

AB - As environmental change accelerates and future uncertainty increases, implementation of strategy inherently involves continuous adjustment and modification. To meet the need for further research on the critical role of communication, this article contributes to the literature by examining the relationship between communication and strategy implementation. I propose that senders’ bias, which refers to the overestimation of the quality of communication (i.e., degree of sharing) with organizational members by senders (i.e., top managers), is a fundamental implementation problem. Thus, top managers’ perceived degree of communication with organizational members is expected to have limited effects on the degree of value sharing and resulting effectiveness of strategy implementation up to a certain threshold point. Additionally, I argue that the relationship between top managers’ perceived degree of communication and strategy implementation are moderated by the type of communication (i.e., whether storytelling is used in the communication), communication medium (i.e., the use of e-mails), and top managers’ openness to the voices of organizational members. The idea of senders’ bias should provide insights into why many organizations struggle with strategy implementation.

KW - management biases

KW - strategy implementation

KW - Voice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043977244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043977244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2329488416675449

DO - 10.1177/2329488416675449

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 52

EP - 69

JO - International Journal of Business Communication

JF - International Journal of Business Communication

SN - 2329-4884

IS - 1

ER -