TY - GEN
T1 - Sentiment analysis
T2 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016
AU - Bouazizi, Mondher
AU - Ohtsuki, Tomoaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/7/12
Y1 - 2016/7/12
N2 - Most of the state of the art works and researches on the automatic sentiment analysis and opinion mining of texts collected from social networks and microblogging websites are oriented towards the classification of texts into positive and negative. In this paper, we propose a pattern-based approach that goes deeper in the classification of texts collected from Twitter (i.e., tweets). We classify the tweets into 7 different classes; however the approach can be run to classify into more classes. Experiments show that our approach reaches an accuracy of classification equal to 56.9% and a precision level of sentimental tweets (other than neutral and sarcastic) equal to 72.58%. Nevertheless, the approach proves to be very accurate in binary classification (i.e., classification into positive and negative) and ternary classification (i.e., classification into positive, negative and neutral): in the former case, we reach an accuracy of 87.5% for the same dataset used after removing neutral tweets, and in the latter case, we reached an accuracy of classification of 83.0%.
AB - Most of the state of the art works and researches on the automatic sentiment analysis and opinion mining of texts collected from social networks and microblogging websites are oriented towards the classification of texts into positive and negative. In this paper, we propose a pattern-based approach that goes deeper in the classification of texts collected from Twitter (i.e., tweets). We classify the tweets into 7 different classes; however the approach can be run to classify into more classes. Experiments show that our approach reaches an accuracy of classification equal to 56.9% and a precision level of sentimental tweets (other than neutral and sarcastic) equal to 72.58%. Nevertheless, the approach proves to be very accurate in binary classification (i.e., classification into positive and negative) and ternary classification (i.e., classification into positive, negative and neutral): in the former case, we reach an accuracy of 87.5% for the same dataset used after removing neutral tweets, and in the latter case, we reached an accuracy of classification of 83.0%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981295687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981295687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2016.7511392
DO - 10.1109/ICC.2016.7511392
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84981295687
T3 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016
BT - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 22 May 2016 through 27 May 2016
ER -