@article{60dd16fc23834583af4acabae8fe5cf3,
title = "Sequence alignment of folk song melodies reveals cross-cultural regularities of musical evolution",
abstract = "Culture evolves,1–5 but the existence of cross-culturally general regularities of cultural evolution is debated.6–8 As a diverse but universal cultural phenomenon, music provides a novel domain to test for the existence of such regularities.9–12 Folk song melodies can be thought of as culturally transmitted sequences of notes that change over time under the influence of cognitive and acoustic/physical constraints.9–15 Modeling melodies as evolving sequences constructed from an “alphabet” of 12 scale degrees16 allows us to quantitatively test for the presence of cross-cultural regularities using a sample of 10,062 melodies from musically divergent Japanese and English (British/American) folk song traditions.17,18 Our analysis identifies 328 pairs of highly related melodies, finding that note changes are more likely when they have smaller impacts on a song's melody. Specifically, (1) notes with stronger rhythmic functions are less likely to change, and (2) note substitutions are most likely between neighboring notes. We also find that note insertions/deletions (“indels”) are more common than note substitutions, unlike genetic evolution where the reverse is true. Our results are consistent across English and Japanese samples despite major differences in their scales and tonal systems. These findings demonstrate that even a creative art form such as music is subject to evolutionary constraints analogous to those governing the evolution of genes, languages, and other domains of culture.",
keywords = "cross-cultural, cultural evolution, music, sequence alignment",
author = "Savage, {Patrick E.} and Sam Passmore and Gakuto Chiba and Currie, {Thomas E.} and Haruo Suzuki and Atkinson, {Quentin D.}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank the singers and song collectors who made this study possible and thank Y. Okazaki and K. Imagawa for help accessing the 日本民謡大観 (Anthology of Japanese folksong). We thank M. Atsushi, S. Brown, H. de Ferranti, S. Fujii, D. Hughes, A. Tsukahara, Y. Uemura, and the attendees of the Brunel Center for Culture and Evolution, Cultural Evolution Online, and Keio SFC Music Science journal clubs for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank L. Maurits for advice regarding phylogenetic analysis, Y. Ozaki and S. Claessens for code review, and Y. Ozaki for data entry assistance. P.E.S. was supported by Grant-in-Aid #19KK0064 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ; a Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) scholarship; and startup grants from Keio University (Keio Global Research Institute, Keio Research Institute at SFC, and Keio Gijuku Academic Development Fund). Q.D.A. is supported by a Royal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (# 11-UOA-019 ). T.E.C. is supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (title: The Cultural Evolution & Ecology of Institutions; grant agreement 716212 ). Funding Information: We thank the singers and song collectors who made this study possible and thank Y. Okazaki and K. Imagawa for help accessing the 日本民謡大観 (Anthology of Japanese folksong). We thank M. Atsushi, S. Brown, H. de Ferranti, S. Fujii, D. Hughes, A. Tsukahara, Y. Uemura, and the attendees of the Brunel Center for Culture and Evolution, Cultural Evolution Online, and Keio SFC Music Science journal clubs for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank L. Maurits for advice regarding phylogenetic analysis, Y. Ozaki and S. Claessens for code review, and Y. Ozaki for data entry assistance. P.E.S. was supported by Grant-in-Aid #19KK0064 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; a Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) scholarship; and startup grants from Keio University (Keio Global Research Institute, Keio Research Institute at SFC, and Keio Gijuku Academic Development Fund). Q.D.A. is supported by a Royal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (#11-UOA-019). T.E.C. is supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (title: The Cultural Evolution & Ecology of Institutions; grant agreement 716212). Conceptualization, P.E.S. Q.D.A. and T.E.C.; methodology, P.E.S. S.P. and H.S.; analysis, P.E.S. S.P. and G.C.; investigation, resources, visualization, and writing – original draft, P.E.S.; writing – review & editing, T.E.C. Q.D.A. S.P. H.S. and G.C. The authors declare no competing interests. We worked to ensure ethnic or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human subjects. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an underrepresented ethnic minority in science. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote gender balance in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.039",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1395--1402.e8",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "6",
}