Skewed soldier sex ratio in termites: Testing the size-threshold hypothesis

T. Bourguignon, Y. Hayashi, T. Miura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social insect colonies contain multiple phenotypes, i. e. castes, and this caste polyphenism is often linked to sexual dimorphism. Unlike social hymenopterans, both termite sexes are diploid and contribute to helper-type tasks within the colony. Nonetheless, a biased sex ratio is frequently observed in termites, especially in soldiers. To explain this bias in soldier sex ratio, Matsuura (Evol. Ecol. 20: 565-574, 2006) postulated the existence of a size threshold for workers molting into soldiers. Under the influence of sexual size dimorphism (SSD), such a threshold was considered to indirectly favor one sex. We conducted a literature survey of sex ratio among termite soldiers and tested this size-threshold hypothesis using data for 67 termite species from a variety of termite lineages. We demonstrated the existence of a size threshold for individuals molting into soldiers, resulting in the acquisition of soldiers of only one sex in species exhibiting strong SSD. In species exhibiting weak SSD, the size threshold skews the sex ratio of soldiers, but does not necessarily cause the loss of one sex. Finally, we observed a prevalence of single-sex soldiers in the Termitidae, regardless of SSD, suggesting that the ancestral developmental mechanisms that constrain soldier differentiation from one sex are maintained in certain extant species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)557-563
Number of pages7
JournalInsectes Sociaux
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Caste polymorphism
  • Isoptera
  • Phylogeny
  • Sexual dimorphism
  • Termite evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Skewed soldier sex ratio in termites: Testing the size-threshold hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this