Slow progression predicts poor prognoses in patients with spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy

Kensuke Ochi, Yukio Horiuchi, Kenichi Tazaki, Shinichiro Takayama, Toshiyasu Nakamura, Kazuki Sato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are still no factors that predict the prognoses of patients with spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsies who are in an early phase of the illness. This paper reviewed 39 patients with this type of palsy. Seventeen patients who requested surgery for possible earlier recovery underwent interfascicular neurolysis because no signs of recovery were seen more than 3 months after onset. A Medical Research Council muscle power grade over 4 at their final visit was considered a good result, while a power less than grade 4 was considered a poor result. The clinical outcomes were significantly worse for the patients who had palsies with slow progressions (for more than 1 month) compared with those who had palsies with rapid progressions (completed within 1 month), regardless of their treatment. No significant difference was seen between the prognoses of patients with complete and incomplete palsies. We, therefore, recommend that interfascicular neurolysis is performed together with tendon transfer as the primary surgical procedures for patients with palsies with slow progression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-497
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec

Keywords

  • Posterior interosseous nerve palsy
  • Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome
  • Prognosis
  • Radial nerve palsy
  • Radial neuropathy
  • Slow progression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Slow progression predicts poor prognoses in patients with spontaneous posterior interosseous nerve palsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this