Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace

A national representative sample in Japan

Kanami Tsuno, Norito Kawakami, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Akihito Shimazu, Akiomi Inoue, Yuko Odagiri, Toru Yoshikawa, Takashi Haratani, Teruichi Shimomitsu, Ichiro Kawachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health.We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20-60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95%Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.01-6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95%CI:1.58-10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95% CI:1.66-10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0119435
JournalPloS one
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 9
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bullying
working conditions
Workplace
socioeconomics
aggression
Japan
Personnel
odds ratio
confidence interval
Odds Ratio
human resources
sampling
Confidence Intervals
Logistics
Frustration
Education
Health
questionnaires
low income households
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Tsuno, K., Kawakami, N., Tsutsumi, A., Shimazu, A., Inoue, A., Odagiri, Y., ... Kawachi, I. (2015). Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: A national representative sample in Japan. PloS one, 10(3), [e0119435]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119435

Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace : A national representative sample in Japan. / Tsuno, Kanami; Kawakami, Norito; Tsutsumi, Akizumi; Shimazu, Akihito; Inoue, Akiomi; Odagiri, Yuko; Yoshikawa, Toru; Haratani, Takashi; Shimomitsu, Teruichi; Kawachi, Ichiro.

In: PloS one, Vol. 10, No. 3, e0119435, 09.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsuno, K, Kawakami, N, Tsutsumi, A, Shimazu, A, Inoue, A, Odagiri, Y, Yoshikawa, T, Haratani, T, Shimomitsu, T & Kawachi, I 2015, 'Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: A national representative sample in Japan', PloS one, vol. 10, no. 3, e0119435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119435
Tsuno, Kanami ; Kawakami, Norito ; Tsutsumi, Akizumi ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Inoue, Akiomi ; Odagiri, Yuko ; Yoshikawa, Toru ; Haratani, Takashi ; Shimomitsu, Teruichi ; Kawachi, Ichiro. / Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace : A national representative sample in Japan. In: PloS one. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{54dd627a03f94c868a504285fa8ccfa5,
title = "Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: A national representative sample in Japan",
abstract = "Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health.We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20-60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95{\%}Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95{\%}CI: 1.01-6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95{\%}CI:1.58-10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95{\%} CI:1.66-10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95{\%}CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.",
author = "Kanami Tsuno and Norito Kawakami and Akizumi Tsutsumi and Akihito Shimazu and Akiomi Inoue and Yuko Odagiri and Toru Yoshikawa and Takashi Haratani and Teruichi Shimomitsu and Ichiro Kawachi",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0119435",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace

T2 - A national representative sample in Japan

AU - Tsuno, Kanami

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Inoue, Akiomi

AU - Odagiri, Yuko

AU - Yoshikawa, Toru

AU - Haratani, Takashi

AU - Shimomitsu, Teruichi

AU - Kawachi, Ichiro

PY - 2015/3/9

Y1 - 2015/3/9

N2 - Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health.We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20-60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95%Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.01-6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95%CI:1.58-10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95% CI:1.66-10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.

AB - Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health.We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20-60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95%Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.01-6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95%CI:1.58-10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95% CI:1.66-10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928923389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928923389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119435

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119435

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0119435

ER -