Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors

Rikard Forslid, Toshihiro Okubo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper focuses on spatial sorting as a mechanism behind the well-established fact that there is a central region productivity premium. Using a model of heterogeneous firms that can move between regions, Baldwin and Okubo (2006) show how more productive firms sort themselves to the large core region. We extend this model by introducing different fixed costs in terms of capital among firms and sectors. In accordance with empirical evidence, more productive firms are assumed to be associated with a higher fixed cost in terms of capital. As a result, our model can produce sorting to the large regions from both ends of the productivity distribution. Firms with high capital intensity and high productivity as well as firms with very low productivity and low capital intensity tend to relocate to the core. We use Japanese micro data to explore the predictions of the model. Many sectors show patterns that are consistent with two-sided sorting. We also find supportive evidence for our model prediction that two-sided sorting occurs in sectors with a high capital intensity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-56
Number of pages15
JournalRegional Science and Urban Economics
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

sorting
capital intensity
firm
productivity
costs
prediction
premium
cost
evidence
Sorting
Heterogeneous firms
Productivity
Capital intensity
Fixed costs

Keywords

  • Agglomeration
  • Firm heterogeneity
  • Productivity
  • Spatial sorting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors. / Forslid, Rikard; Okubo, Toshihiro.

In: Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2014, p. 42-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fd530db88c94dec9441a3a3d6e8e1df,
title = "Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors",
abstract = "The present paper focuses on spatial sorting as a mechanism behind the well-established fact that there is a central region productivity premium. Using a model of heterogeneous firms that can move between regions, Baldwin and Okubo (2006) show how more productive firms sort themselves to the large core region. We extend this model by introducing different fixed costs in terms of capital among firms and sectors. In accordance with empirical evidence, more productive firms are assumed to be associated with a higher fixed cost in terms of capital. As a result, our model can produce sorting to the large regions from both ends of the productivity distribution. Firms with high capital intensity and high productivity as well as firms with very low productivity and low capital intensity tend to relocate to the core. We use Japanese micro data to explore the predictions of the model. Many sectors show patterns that are consistent with two-sided sorting. We also find supportive evidence for our model prediction that two-sided sorting occurs in sectors with a high capital intensity.",
keywords = "Agglomeration, Firm heterogeneity, Productivity, Spatial sorting",
author = "Rikard Forslid and Toshihiro Okubo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "42--56",
journal = "Regional Science and Urban Economics",
issn = "0166-0462",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors

AU - Forslid, Rikard

AU - Okubo, Toshihiro

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The present paper focuses on spatial sorting as a mechanism behind the well-established fact that there is a central region productivity premium. Using a model of heterogeneous firms that can move between regions, Baldwin and Okubo (2006) show how more productive firms sort themselves to the large core region. We extend this model by introducing different fixed costs in terms of capital among firms and sectors. In accordance with empirical evidence, more productive firms are assumed to be associated with a higher fixed cost in terms of capital. As a result, our model can produce sorting to the large regions from both ends of the productivity distribution. Firms with high capital intensity and high productivity as well as firms with very low productivity and low capital intensity tend to relocate to the core. We use Japanese micro data to explore the predictions of the model. Many sectors show patterns that are consistent with two-sided sorting. We also find supportive evidence for our model prediction that two-sided sorting occurs in sectors with a high capital intensity.

AB - The present paper focuses on spatial sorting as a mechanism behind the well-established fact that there is a central region productivity premium. Using a model of heterogeneous firms that can move between regions, Baldwin and Okubo (2006) show how more productive firms sort themselves to the large core region. We extend this model by introducing different fixed costs in terms of capital among firms and sectors. In accordance with empirical evidence, more productive firms are assumed to be associated with a higher fixed cost in terms of capital. As a result, our model can produce sorting to the large regions from both ends of the productivity distribution. Firms with high capital intensity and high productivity as well as firms with very low productivity and low capital intensity tend to relocate to the core. We use Japanese micro data to explore the predictions of the model. Many sectors show patterns that are consistent with two-sided sorting. We also find supportive evidence for our model prediction that two-sided sorting occurs in sectors with a high capital intensity.

KW - Agglomeration

KW - Firm heterogeneity

KW - Productivity

KW - Spatial sorting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896348213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896348213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.02.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896348213

VL - 46

SP - 42

EP - 56

JO - Regional Science and Urban Economics

JF - Regional Science and Urban Economics

SN - 0166-0462

IS - 1

ER -