Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening: Evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population

Hiroshi Kawabe, Ikuo Saito, Takao Saruta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (≥140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n=70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 ± 12/88 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (130 ± 12/79 ± 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n=558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 ± 13/72 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (114 ± 12/68 ± 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n=72), casual blood pressure (145 ± 14/92 ± 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 ± 16/89 ± 11 mmHg) and evening (134 ± 16/83 ± 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP ≥ 135 mmHg and/or DBP ≥85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n=52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p=0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p=0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n=18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-498
Number of pages8
JournalHypertension Research
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jun

Fingerprint

Urban Population
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • Antihypertensive drug
  • Casual blood pressure
  • Home blood pressure
  • Morning hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening : Evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population. / Kawabe, Hiroshi; Saito, Ikuo; Saruta, Takao.

In: Hypertension Research, Vol. 28, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 491-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{038d7ffde7ac4425a0a34c387a6d7190,
title = "Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening: Evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population",
abstract = "To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (≥140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n=70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 ± 12/88 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (130 ± 12/79 ± 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n=558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 ± 13/72 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (114 ± 12/68 ± 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n=72), casual blood pressure (145 ± 14/92 ± 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 ± 16/89 ± 11 mmHg) and evening (134 ± 16/83 ± 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP ≥ 135 mmHg and/or DBP ≥85 mmHg), 7.2{\%} (systolic) and 8.7{\%} (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3{\%} for SBP and 70.0{\%} for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9{\%}), morning DBP (40.0{\%}), evening SBP (10.0{\%}), and evening DBP (17.1{\%}) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n=52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p=0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p=0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n=18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.",
keywords = "Antihypertensive drug, Casual blood pressure, Home blood pressure, Morning hypertension",
author = "Hiroshi Kawabe and Ikuo Saito and Takao Saruta",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1291/hypres.28.491",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "491--498",
journal = "Hypertension Research",
issn = "0916-9636",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Status of home blood pressure measured in morning and evening

T2 - Evaluation in normotensives and hypertensives in Japanese urban population

AU - Kawabe, Hiroshi

AU - Saito, Ikuo

AU - Saruta, Takao

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (≥140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n=70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 ± 12/88 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (130 ± 12/79 ± 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n=558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 ± 13/72 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (114 ± 12/68 ± 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n=72), casual blood pressure (145 ± 14/92 ± 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 ± 16/89 ± 11 mmHg) and evening (134 ± 16/83 ± 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP ≥ 135 mmHg and/or DBP ≥85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n=52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p=0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p=0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n=18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.

AB - To assess home blood pressure status in a Japanese urban population, we analyzed home blood pressure values in normotensive subjects determined by casual blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), hypertensive subjects without medication (≥140/90 mmHg) and treated hypertensive patients. The subjects (468 male, 232 female; mean age 41 years old) were recruited from a company located in Tokyo. Home blood pressure was measured with a semi-automatic device (Omron HEM-759P). Subjects were instructed to perform triplicate morning and evening measurements on 7 consecutive days. In the treated hypertensive group (n=70), there was a significant difference between morning (139 ± 12/88 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (130 ± 12/79 ± 8 mmHg) home blood pressure. In the normotensive group (n=558), however, only the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) component of the home blood pressure was significantly different between morning (115 ± 13/72 ± 9 mmHg) and evening (114 ± 12/68 ± 8 mmHg). In the nontreated hypertensive group (n=72), casual blood pressure (145 ± 14/92 ± 9 mmHg) was higher than morning (138 ± 16/89 ± 11 mmHg) and evening (134 ± 16/83 ± 11 mmHg) home blood pressure, but no difference was seen between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (SBP). According to the reference value of the Japanese Society of Hypertension 2004 (SBP ≥ 135 mmHg and/or DBP ≥85 mmHg), 7.2% (systolic) and 8.7% (diastolic) of subjects in the normotensive group were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Casual blood pressure in the treated hypertensive group was normal in 64.3% for SBP and 70.0% for DBP. However, their morning SBP (32.9%), morning DBP (40.0%), evening SBP (10.0%), and evening DBP (17.1%) were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure. Furthermore, patients who were taking antihypertensive drug(s) only in the morning (n=52) showed higher morning SBP (6 mmHg, p=0.086) and morning DBP (6 mmHg, p=0.005) than patients taking drug(s) by other administration schedules (n=18), but no difference in evening home blood pressure was observed. In conclusion, a proportion of the subjects defined as normotensive by casual blood pressure were classified as hypertensive by home blood pressure in the present urban population. Furthermore, morning home blood pressure control in the treated hypertensive group classified as under control by casual blood pressure was insufficient, especially in patients who were taking medication only in the morning.

KW - Antihypertensive drug

KW - Casual blood pressure

KW - Home blood pressure

KW - Morning hypertension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944494117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944494117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1291/hypres.28.491

DO - 10.1291/hypres.28.491

M3 - Article

C2 - 16231754

AN - SCOPUS:23944494117

VL - 28

SP - 491

EP - 498

JO - Hypertension Research

JF - Hypertension Research

SN - 0916-9636

IS - 6

ER -