Substantial differences in preparedness for emergency infection control measures among major hospitals in Japan: Lessons from SARS

Teppei Imai, Ken Takahashi, Tsutomu Hoshuyama, Naoki Hasegawa, Sin Eng Chia, David Koh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Emergency infection control measures are essential in hospitals. Although Japan was spared from the 2003 epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), hospitals were placed on high alert. The actual preparedness level of hospitals can be determined by examining individual perceptions among the hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to assess the level of preparedness of emergency infection control measures in Japan and to quantify the differences in preparedness across institutions and disciplines. From July to September 2003, a questionnaire survey concerning the perceptions of risks and countermeasures and knowledge about SARS was distributed at seven tertiary hospitals. Disciplines were categorized as emergency room (ER)/intensive care unit (ICU), surgical, medical, and "others". Of the 9978 questionnaires administered, 6929 valid responses were received and analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex, and job category, specific institutional measures (I-scores) were found to be more indicative of the level of preparedness across institutions and disciplines than were measures of overall effectiveness (E-scores) or knowledge of preventive measures (K-scores). In particular, the difference in I-scores was much more substantial across institutions than across disciplines. Across disciplines, surgical ranked lower than ER/ICU or medical. In conclusion, substantial differences in emergency infection control measures, as perceived by HCWs, exists among hospitals in Japan, with the differences across institutions exceeding those across disciplines. To achieve a higher level of preparedness for infectious diseases, institutions should designate and implement effective emergency infection control measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-131
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jun

Fingerprint

Civil Defense
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Infection Control
Japan
Emergencies
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Emergency Service
Delivery of Health Care
Tertiary Care Centers
Communicable Diseases

Keywords

  • Infection control
  • Occupational health
  • Questionnaires
  • SARS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Substantial differences in preparedness for emergency infection control measures among major hospitals in Japan : Lessons from SARS. / Imai, Teppei; Takahashi, Ken; Hoshuyama, Tsutomu; Hasegawa, Naoki; Chia, Sin Eng; Koh, David.

In: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 06.2006, p. 124-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Imai, Teppei ; Takahashi, Ken ; Hoshuyama, Tsutomu ; Hasegawa, Naoki ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Koh, David. / Substantial differences in preparedness for emergency infection control measures among major hospitals in Japan : Lessons from SARS. In: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 124-131.
@article{e39b3b84f7d34debbfd8c764380074e2,
title = "Substantial differences in preparedness for emergency infection control measures among major hospitals in Japan: Lessons from SARS",
abstract = "Emergency infection control measures are essential in hospitals. Although Japan was spared from the 2003 epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), hospitals were placed on high alert. The actual preparedness level of hospitals can be determined by examining individual perceptions among the hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to assess the level of preparedness of emergency infection control measures in Japan and to quantify the differences in preparedness across institutions and disciplines. From July to September 2003, a questionnaire survey concerning the perceptions of risks and countermeasures and knowledge about SARS was distributed at seven tertiary hospitals. Disciplines were categorized as emergency room (ER)/intensive care unit (ICU), surgical, medical, and {"}others{"}. Of the 9978 questionnaires administered, 6929 valid responses were received and analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex, and job category, specific institutional measures (I-scores) were found to be more indicative of the level of preparedness across institutions and disciplines than were measures of overall effectiveness (E-scores) or knowledge of preventive measures (K-scores). In particular, the difference in I-scores was much more substantial across institutions than across disciplines. Across disciplines, surgical ranked lower than ER/ICU or medical. In conclusion, substantial differences in emergency infection control measures, as perceived by HCWs, exists among hospitals in Japan, with the differences across institutions exceeding those across disciplines. To achieve a higher level of preparedness for infectious diseases, institutions should designate and implement effective emergency infection control measures.",
keywords = "Infection control, Occupational health, Questionnaires, SARS",
author = "Teppei Imai and Ken Takahashi and Tsutomu Hoshuyama and Naoki Hasegawa and Chia, {Sin Eng} and David Koh",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10156-006-0436-0",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "124--131",
journal = "Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy",
issn = "1341-321X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substantial differences in preparedness for emergency infection control measures among major hospitals in Japan

T2 - Lessons from SARS

AU - Imai, Teppei

AU - Takahashi, Ken

AU - Hoshuyama, Tsutomu

AU - Hasegawa, Naoki

AU - Chia, Sin Eng

AU - Koh, David

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Emergency infection control measures are essential in hospitals. Although Japan was spared from the 2003 epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), hospitals were placed on high alert. The actual preparedness level of hospitals can be determined by examining individual perceptions among the hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to assess the level of preparedness of emergency infection control measures in Japan and to quantify the differences in preparedness across institutions and disciplines. From July to September 2003, a questionnaire survey concerning the perceptions of risks and countermeasures and knowledge about SARS was distributed at seven tertiary hospitals. Disciplines were categorized as emergency room (ER)/intensive care unit (ICU), surgical, medical, and "others". Of the 9978 questionnaires administered, 6929 valid responses were received and analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex, and job category, specific institutional measures (I-scores) were found to be more indicative of the level of preparedness across institutions and disciplines than were measures of overall effectiveness (E-scores) or knowledge of preventive measures (K-scores). In particular, the difference in I-scores was much more substantial across institutions than across disciplines. Across disciplines, surgical ranked lower than ER/ICU or medical. In conclusion, substantial differences in emergency infection control measures, as perceived by HCWs, exists among hospitals in Japan, with the differences across institutions exceeding those across disciplines. To achieve a higher level of preparedness for infectious diseases, institutions should designate and implement effective emergency infection control measures.

AB - Emergency infection control measures are essential in hospitals. Although Japan was spared from the 2003 epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), hospitals were placed on high alert. The actual preparedness level of hospitals can be determined by examining individual perceptions among the hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to assess the level of preparedness of emergency infection control measures in Japan and to quantify the differences in preparedness across institutions and disciplines. From July to September 2003, a questionnaire survey concerning the perceptions of risks and countermeasures and knowledge about SARS was distributed at seven tertiary hospitals. Disciplines were categorized as emergency room (ER)/intensive care unit (ICU), surgical, medical, and "others". Of the 9978 questionnaires administered, 6929 valid responses were received and analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex, and job category, specific institutional measures (I-scores) were found to be more indicative of the level of preparedness across institutions and disciplines than were measures of overall effectiveness (E-scores) or knowledge of preventive measures (K-scores). In particular, the difference in I-scores was much more substantial across institutions than across disciplines. Across disciplines, surgical ranked lower than ER/ICU or medical. In conclusion, substantial differences in emergency infection control measures, as perceived by HCWs, exists among hospitals in Japan, with the differences across institutions exceeding those across disciplines. To achieve a higher level of preparedness for infectious diseases, institutions should designate and implement effective emergency infection control measures.

KW - Infection control

KW - Occupational health

KW - Questionnaires

KW - SARS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745774806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745774806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10156-006-0436-0

DO - 10.1007/s10156-006-0436-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 16826344

AN - SCOPUS:33745774806

VL - 12

SP - 124

EP - 131

JO - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

JF - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

SN - 1341-321X

IS - 3

ER -