TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical Outcomes for Drop Body Syndrome in Adult Spinal Deformity
AU - Yagi, Mitsuru
AU - Fujita, Nobuyuki
AU - Okada, Eijiro
AU - Tsuji, Osahiko
AU - Nagoshi, Narihito
AU - Yato, Yoshiyuki
AU - Asazuma, Takashi
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Watanabe, Kota
PY - 2019/4/15
Y1 - 2019/4/15
N2 - STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective case series of patients treated surgically for adult spinal deformity (ASD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between propensity score matched ASD patients with or without drop body syndrome (DBS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DBS is an extreme primary sagittal-plane deformity often seen in Asian countries. Although the importance of sagittal alignment is widely recognized, surgical outcomes for deformities purely in the sagittal plane are poorly understood. METHODS: This study included 243 consecutive patients (age 66 ± 17 years; range 22-78) who were treated surgically for ASD and were followed at least 2 years (mean follow-up 3.7 ± 2.3 years). DBS was defined as a primary lumbar kyphosis with PI-LL >40°, Cobb angle <30°, and multifidus cross-sectional area <300 mm. DBS patients were matched with non-DBS patients by propensity scores for age, gender, lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) level, and number of levels fused. Demographics, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between DBS and non-DBS patients. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with ASD, 34 had DBS (14%); 28 of these were propensity-matched with ASD patients without DBS. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), and frailty were similar in DBS and non-DBS patients. Baseline sagittal alignment was worse in DBS than in non-DBS patients [C7SVA 14 ± 5 vs. 8 ± 5 cm; pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) 60 ± 14 vs. 36 ± 20°], and scoliosis research society (SRS)22 scores were also worse for DBS patients (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8). Although DBS patients had more complications (20 DBS vs. 16 non-DBS), the clinical outcomes were similarly improved in both groups after surgery. At the 2-year follow-up, the spinopelvic malalignment was worse in DBS than non-DBS patients (PI-LL 17 ± 16° vs. 8 ± 13°, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DBS affected 14% of 234 ASD patients. Although DBS patients had inferior baseline SRS22 scores than non-DBS patients, ASD surgery resulted in similar clinical improvement in both groups. Future studies should examine the influence of lifestyle and genetics on clinical outcomes after surgery for DBS.3.
AB - STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective case series of patients treated surgically for adult spinal deformity (ASD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between propensity score matched ASD patients with or without drop body syndrome (DBS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DBS is an extreme primary sagittal-plane deformity often seen in Asian countries. Although the importance of sagittal alignment is widely recognized, surgical outcomes for deformities purely in the sagittal plane are poorly understood. METHODS: This study included 243 consecutive patients (age 66 ± 17 years; range 22-78) who were treated surgically for ASD and were followed at least 2 years (mean follow-up 3.7 ± 2.3 years). DBS was defined as a primary lumbar kyphosis with PI-LL >40°, Cobb angle <30°, and multifidus cross-sectional area <300 mm. DBS patients were matched with non-DBS patients by propensity scores for age, gender, lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) level, and number of levels fused. Demographics, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between DBS and non-DBS patients. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with ASD, 34 had DBS (14%); 28 of these were propensity-matched with ASD patients without DBS. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), and frailty were similar in DBS and non-DBS patients. Baseline sagittal alignment was worse in DBS than in non-DBS patients [C7SVA 14 ± 5 vs. 8 ± 5 cm; pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) 60 ± 14 vs. 36 ± 20°], and scoliosis research society (SRS)22 scores were also worse for DBS patients (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8). Although DBS patients had more complications (20 DBS vs. 16 non-DBS), the clinical outcomes were similarly improved in both groups after surgery. At the 2-year follow-up, the spinopelvic malalignment was worse in DBS than non-DBS patients (PI-LL 17 ± 16° vs. 8 ± 13°, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DBS affected 14% of 234 ASD patients. Although DBS patients had inferior baseline SRS22 scores than non-DBS patients, ASD surgery resulted in similar clinical improvement in both groups. Future studies should examine the influence of lifestyle and genetics on clinical outcomes after surgery for DBS.3.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064120377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064120377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002879
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002879
M3 - Article
C2 - 30234798
AN - SCOPUS:85064120377
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 44
SP - 571
EP - 578
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 8
ER -