TY - JOUR
T1 - Terrestrial ecosystem management for climate change mitigation
AU - Obersteiner, Michael
AU - Böttcher, Hannes
AU - Yamagata, Yoshiki
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) under grant agreement no. 212535, Climate Change — Terrestrial Adaptation and Mitigation in Europe (CC-TAME), www.cctame.eu (see Article II.30. of the Grant Agreement).
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Decreasing the human impact on the atmosphere will necessitate active management of terrestrial carbon pools and greenhouse gas fluxes. Biospheric greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures such as increasing forest area and increasing forest biomass density, build-up of soil carbon and avoided emissions from deforestation offer cost-efficient solutions while in the long run they are limited by land availability, saturation, and concerns about their permanence. Biomass can also be used to produce low greenhouse gas intensive materials, feedstock for energy production and if combined with carbon capture and sequestration it can offer permanent negative emissions. Although most terrestrial management options appear as competitive mitigation measures from an economic point of view, issues of governance remain most contentious as they induce competition for land and other ecosystem services.
AB - Decreasing the human impact on the atmosphere will necessitate active management of terrestrial carbon pools and greenhouse gas fluxes. Biospheric greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures such as increasing forest area and increasing forest biomass density, build-up of soil carbon and avoided emissions from deforestation offer cost-efficient solutions while in the long run they are limited by land availability, saturation, and concerns about their permanence. Biomass can also be used to produce low greenhouse gas intensive materials, feedstock for energy production and if combined with carbon capture and sequestration it can offer permanent negative emissions. Although most terrestrial management options appear as competitive mitigation measures from an economic point of view, issues of governance remain most contentious as they induce competition for land and other ecosystem services.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957752395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957752395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.006
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:77957752395
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 2
SP - 271
EP - 276
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
IS - 4
ER -