The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization

Julio Cabral Teehankee, Yuko Kasuya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAsian Journal of Comparative Politics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

party system
pathology
Philippines
mobilization
election
candidacy
clientelism
president
political support
political action
referendum
mayor
allies
opposition
rating

Keywords

  • patronage
  • Philippine elections
  • populism
  • populist mobilization
  • Rodrigo R. Duterte

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{b60341e366034dc6a36d9e89ce0205f5,
title = "The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization",
abstract = "The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself.",
keywords = "patronage, Philippine elections, populism, populist mobilization, Rodrigo R. Duterte",
author = "Teehankee, {Julio Cabral} and Yuko Kasuya",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2057891119896425",
language = "English",
journal = "Asian Journal of Comparative Politics",
issn = "2057-8911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines

T2 - Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization

AU - Teehankee, Julio Cabral

AU - Kasuya, Yuko

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself.

AB - The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself.

KW - patronage

KW - Philippine elections

KW - populism

KW - populist mobilization

KW - Rodrigo R. Duterte

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077385343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077385343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2057891119896425

DO - 10.1177/2057891119896425

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077385343

JO - Asian Journal of Comparative Politics

JF - Asian Journal of Comparative Politics

SN - 2057-8911

ER -