The brain and the braincase: A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans

Emiliano Bruner, Hideki Amano, José Manuel de la Cuétara, Naomichi Ogihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-276
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Anatomy
Volume227
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Spatial Analysis
spatial analysis
brain
Parietal Lobe
Brain
bone
bones
sutures
skull
Skull
Cranial Sutures
Parietal Bone
Neuroanatomy
Bone and Bones
morphogenesis
individual variation
Morphogenesis
anatomy
Sutures
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Geometric morphometrics
  • Neuroanatomy
  • Paleoneurology
  • Parietal lobes
  • Precuneus
  • Vault

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

The brain and the braincase : A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans. / Bruner, Emiliano; Amano, Hideki; de la Cuétara, José Manuel; Ogihara, Naomichi.

In: Journal of Anatomy, Vol. 227, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 268-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bruner, E, Amano, H, de la Cuétara, JM & Ogihara, N 2015, 'The brain and the braincase: A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans', Journal of Anatomy, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12355
Bruner, Emiliano ; Amano, Hideki ; de la Cuétara, José Manuel ; Ogihara, Naomichi. / The brain and the braincase : A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans. In: Journal of Anatomy. 2015 ; Vol. 227, No. 3. pp. 268-276.
@article{ac5a4a5c8d524d73839998e5b077984d,
title = "The brain and the braincase: A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans",
abstract = "The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.",
keywords = "Geometric morphometrics, Neuroanatomy, Paleoneurology, Parietal lobes, Precuneus, Vault",
author = "Emiliano Bruner and Hideki Amano and {de la Cu{\'e}tara}, {Jos{\'e} Manuel} and Naomichi Ogihara",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/joa.12355",
language = "English",
volume = "227",
pages = "268--276",
journal = "Journal of Anatomy",
issn = "0021-8782",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The brain and the braincase

T2 - A spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans

AU - Bruner, Emiliano

AU - Amano, Hideki

AU - de la Cuétara, José Manuel

AU - Ogihara, Naomichi

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.

AB - The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.

KW - Geometric morphometrics

KW - Neuroanatomy

KW - Paleoneurology

KW - Parietal lobes

KW - Precuneus

KW - Vault

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939468477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939468477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/joa.12355

DO - 10.1111/joa.12355

M3 - Article

C2 - 26200138

AN - SCOPUS:84939468477

VL - 227

SP - 268

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Anatomy

JF - Journal of Anatomy

SN - 0021-8782

IS - 3

ER -