The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Ayano Akita, Akihiro Tanimoto, Hiromitsu Jinno, Kaori Kameyama, Sachio Kuribayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P<0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 24% and an accuracy of 44%, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 96%. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2089-2096
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Calcinosis
Mammography
Breast
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Vacuum
Biopsy
Mammary Ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Mammography
  • Microcalcifications
  • MRI
  • Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging : Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography? / Akita, Ayano; Tanimoto, Akihiro; Jinno, Hiromitsu; Kameyama, Kaori; Kuribayashi, Sachio.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 9, 2009, p. 2089-2096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3a96992ee0240678469849e4c71ab18,
title = "The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P<0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100{\%}, a specificity of 24{\%} and an accuracy of 44{\%}, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85{\%}, a specificity of 100{\%} and an accuracy of 96{\%}. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.",
keywords = "Breast, Mammography, Microcalcifications, MRI, Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy",
author = "Ayano Akita and Akihiro Tanimoto and Hiromitsu Jinno and Kaori Kameyama and Sachio Kuribayashi",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-009-1396-4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "2089--2096",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging

T2 - Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

AU - Akita, Ayano

AU - Tanimoto, Akihiro

AU - Jinno, Hiromitsu

AU - Kameyama, Kaori

AU - Kuribayashi, Sachio

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P<0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 24% and an accuracy of 44%, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 96%. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P<0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 24% and an accuracy of 44%, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 96%. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.

KW - Breast

KW - Mammography

KW - Microcalcifications

KW - MRI

KW - Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68449085677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68449085677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-009-1396-4

DO - 10.1007/s00330-009-1396-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 19350244

AN - SCOPUS:68449085677

VL - 19

SP - 2089

EP - 2096

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 9

ER -