The convergence of computing and telecommunications systems

David Farber, Paul Baran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since we do not know of any complete ly workable solutions to the problems we have considered, we shall settle for a few general observations: 1) The public availability of socially useful computer communications ser vices is and has been held back by legal battles that are now under way between the potential suppliers. 2) No simple resolution of these issues in the near future seems likely in view of the past conceptual separation of com puters and communications doctrines. 3) The current policy is to determine whether the nation shall or shall not have certain computer communications ser vices, by the adversary process. In this process, often only the voices of the loudest adversary suppliers are heard. 4) Although there can be no certainty that better alternatives cannot be de vised, we believe that such a possibility assumes a higher probability if the key actors come from the technical commu nity sectors more representative of the future consumers. 5) If we are to have the new services that are possible, we need an approach that makes better use of the tech nologists' dreams and goals rather than have future prospects excessively bound by lawyers paid to preserve the interests of their clients, irrespective of any secondary consequences. 6) We cannot be sanguine about this possibility, as technological statesman ship is too easily corrupted by the same forces that have placed us in this predica ment. Furthermore, even if not corrupt ed, beneficial cooperation can too read ily be regarded as simply collusion. 7) Although we do not have any clear answer, we do know that present ap proaches are not taking us where we want to go very rapidly and that alterna tive approaches should at least be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1166-1170
Number of pages5
JournalScience
Volume195
Issue number4283
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1977 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Telecommunication systems
Communication
Ships
Availability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

The convergence of computing and telecommunications systems. / Farber, David; Baran, Paul.

In: Science, Vol. 195, No. 4283, 01.01.1977, p. 1166-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farber, David ; Baran, Paul. / The convergence of computing and telecommunications systems. In: Science. 1977 ; Vol. 195, No. 4283. pp. 1166-1170.
@article{fd1faad272ff4a79b3e4bcbd4fa88be3,
title = "The convergence of computing and telecommunications systems",
abstract = "Since we do not know of any complete ly workable solutions to the problems we have considered, we shall settle for a few general observations: 1) The public availability of socially useful computer communications ser vices is and has been held back by legal battles that are now under way between the potential suppliers. 2) No simple resolution of these issues in the near future seems likely in view of the past conceptual separation of com puters and communications doctrines. 3) The current policy is to determine whether the nation shall or shall not have certain computer communications ser vices, by the adversary process. In this process, often only the voices of the loudest adversary suppliers are heard. 4) Although there can be no certainty that better alternatives cannot be de vised, we believe that such a possibility assumes a higher probability if the key actors come from the technical commu nity sectors more representative of the future consumers. 5) If we are to have the new services that are possible, we need an approach that makes better use of the tech nologists' dreams and goals rather than have future prospects excessively bound by lawyers paid to preserve the interests of their clients, irrespective of any secondary consequences. 6) We cannot be sanguine about this possibility, as technological statesman ship is too easily corrupted by the same forces that have placed us in this predica ment. Furthermore, even if not corrupt ed, beneficial cooperation can too read ily be regarded as simply collusion. 7) Although we do not have any clear answer, we do know that present ap proaches are not taking us where we want to go very rapidly and that alterna tive approaches should at least be considered.",
author = "David Farber and Paul Baran",
year = "1977",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1126/science.195.4283.1166",
language = "English",
volume = "195",
pages = "1166--1170",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "4283",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The convergence of computing and telecommunications systems

AU - Farber, David

AU - Baran, Paul

PY - 1977/1/1

Y1 - 1977/1/1

N2 - Since we do not know of any complete ly workable solutions to the problems we have considered, we shall settle for a few general observations: 1) The public availability of socially useful computer communications ser vices is and has been held back by legal battles that are now under way between the potential suppliers. 2) No simple resolution of these issues in the near future seems likely in view of the past conceptual separation of com puters and communications doctrines. 3) The current policy is to determine whether the nation shall or shall not have certain computer communications ser vices, by the adversary process. In this process, often only the voices of the loudest adversary suppliers are heard. 4) Although there can be no certainty that better alternatives cannot be de vised, we believe that such a possibility assumes a higher probability if the key actors come from the technical commu nity sectors more representative of the future consumers. 5) If we are to have the new services that are possible, we need an approach that makes better use of the tech nologists' dreams and goals rather than have future prospects excessively bound by lawyers paid to preserve the interests of their clients, irrespective of any secondary consequences. 6) We cannot be sanguine about this possibility, as technological statesman ship is too easily corrupted by the same forces that have placed us in this predica ment. Furthermore, even if not corrupt ed, beneficial cooperation can too read ily be regarded as simply collusion. 7) Although we do not have any clear answer, we do know that present ap proaches are not taking us where we want to go very rapidly and that alterna tive approaches should at least be considered.

AB - Since we do not know of any complete ly workable solutions to the problems we have considered, we shall settle for a few general observations: 1) The public availability of socially useful computer communications ser vices is and has been held back by legal battles that are now under way between the potential suppliers. 2) No simple resolution of these issues in the near future seems likely in view of the past conceptual separation of com puters and communications doctrines. 3) The current policy is to determine whether the nation shall or shall not have certain computer communications ser vices, by the adversary process. In this process, often only the voices of the loudest adversary suppliers are heard. 4) Although there can be no certainty that better alternatives cannot be de vised, we believe that such a possibility assumes a higher probability if the key actors come from the technical commu nity sectors more representative of the future consumers. 5) If we are to have the new services that are possible, we need an approach that makes better use of the tech nologists' dreams and goals rather than have future prospects excessively bound by lawyers paid to preserve the interests of their clients, irrespective of any secondary consequences. 6) We cannot be sanguine about this possibility, as technological statesman ship is too easily corrupted by the same forces that have placed us in this predica ment. Furthermore, even if not corrupt ed, beneficial cooperation can too read ily be regarded as simply collusion. 7) Although we do not have any clear answer, we do know that present ap proaches are not taking us where we want to go very rapidly and that alterna tive approaches should at least be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346389848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346389848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.195.4283.1166

DO - 10.1126/science.195.4283.1166

M3 - Article

VL - 195

SP - 1166

EP - 1170

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 4283

ER -